...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Early Intervention in Low Birth Weight Premature Infants: Results at 18 Years of Age for the Infant Health and Development Program
【24h】

Early Intervention in Low Birth Weight Premature Infants: Results at 18 Years of Age for the Infant Health and Development Program

机译:低出生体重早产儿的早期干预:18岁时婴儿健康与发展计划的结果

获取原文

摘要

OBJECTIVE. To assess whether improvements in cognitive and behavioral development seen in preschool educational programs persist, we compared those in a multisite randomized trial of such a program over the first 3 years of life (INT) to those with follow-up only (FUO) at 18 months of age.METHODS. This was a prospective follow-up of the Infant Health and Development Program at 8 sites heterogeneous for sociodemographic characteristics. Originally 985 children were randomized to the INT ( n = 377) or FUO ( n = 608) groups within 2 birth weight strata: heavier low birth weight (HLBW; 2001–2499 g) and lighter low birth weight (LLBW; ≤2000 g). Primary outcome measures were the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-III), reading and mathematics subscales of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement, youth self-report on the Total Behavior Problem Index, and high-risk behaviors on the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS). Secondary outcomes included Weschler full-scale IQ, caregiver report on the Total Behavior Problem Index, and caregiver and youth self-reported physical health using the Medical Outcome Study measure. Assessors were masked as to study status.RESULTS. We assessed 636 youths at 18 years (64.6% of the 985, 72% of whom had not died or refused at prior assessments). After adjusting for cohort attrition, differences favoring the INT group were seen on the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement in math (5.1 points), YRBSS (?0.7 points), and the PPVT-III (3.8 points) in the HLBW youth. In the LLBW youth, the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement in reading was higher in the FUO than INT group (4.2).CONCLUSIONS. The findings in the HLBW INT group provide support for preschool education to make long-term changes in a diverse group of children who are at developmental risk. The lack of observable benefit in the LLBW group raises questions about the biological and educational factors that foster or inhibit sustained effects of early educational intervention.
机译:目的。为了评估学前教育计划中认知和行为发展是否持续改善,我们比较了该计划在出生后头3年(INT)与仅接受随访(FUO)的18岁儿童的多站点随机试验中的结果。月龄。方法。这是对8个因社会人口统计学特征而异源的地点的婴儿健康与发展计划的一项前瞻性随访。最初,将985名儿童随机分为两个出生体重分层中的INT(n = 377)或FUO(n = 608)组:较重的低出生体重(HLBW; 2001–2499 g)和较轻的低出生体重(LLBW;≤2000g )。主要结局指标包括:皮博迪图片词汇测验(PPVT-III),伍德考克-约翰逊成就测验的阅读和数学子量表,青少年总行为问题指数的自我报告以及青少年风险行为监测的高风险行为系统(YRBSS)。次要结果包括Weschler全面智商,照护者关于“总行为问题指数”的报告以及照护者和年轻人使用“医疗结果研究”方法自我报告的身体健康状况。评估者被掩盖了研究状态。结果。我们对18岁时的636名青年进行了评估(占985名青年的64.6%,其中72%在先前的评估中没有死亡或拒绝)。在调整了队列损耗之后,在HLBW青年中,伍德考克-约翰逊数学成绩测验(5.1分),YRBSS(?0.7分)和PPVT-III(3.8分)上发现了对INT组有利的差异。在LLBW青年中,FUO的伍德考克-约翰逊阅读成绩测验比INT组高(4.2)。结论。 HLBW INT小组的研究结果为学前教育提供了支持,以使处于发育风险中的各种儿童进行长期改变。 LLBW组缺乏可观察到的益处,这引发了有关促进或抑制早期教育干预的持续影响的生物学和教育因素的问题。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号