首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Successful Implementation of a Radiology Sedation Service Staffed Exclusively by Pediatric Emergency Physicians
【24h】

Successful Implementation of a Radiology Sedation Service Staffed Exclusively by Pediatric Emergency Physicians

机译:成功实施了由儿科急诊医师独家配备的放射镇静服务

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE. As the number of diagnostic imaging studies performed has increased, the demand for sedation in support of these radiologic tests has also increased. Our objectives were to (1) assess the safety and efficacy of a radiology sedation service that is staffed exclusively by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians, (2) determine the frequency and the type of commonly performed pediatric imaging studies that require procedural sedation, and (3) assess the average duration of procedural sedation for commonly performed radiologic studies.METHODS. We conducted a retrospective observational study of patient encounters in 2004 involving procedural sedation to facilitate diagnostic imaging. We are a university-affiliated group of PEM physicians that provide a radiology sedation service during weekdays at a freestanding urban children's hospital.RESULTS. The sedation service participated in 1285 patient encounters during the study period. Deep sedation was provided to 1027 patients. Moderate sedation was administered to 258 patients. Procedural sedation times for the most frequently performed imaging studies ranged from 5 to 183 minutes. Agents that were used to provide deep sedation were pentobarbital (with midazolam, fentanyl, or both) in 65% of cases, propofol in 31%, and ketamine (with or without midazolam) in 4%. Moderate sedation was achieved with chloral hydrate in 86% and oral diazepam in 14% of the cases. A total of 99.1% of the imaging studies were completed successfully. Six imaging studies were aborted because of failed sedation or occurrence of adverse event. Five patients who were deemed high risk on their presedation evaluation were referred electively for general anesthesia.CONCLUSIONS. Our data suggest that a dedicated sedation team in support of diagnostic imaging services, staffed exclusively by PEM physicians, can be a successful clinical enterprise. The service consumes significant resources and physician time.
机译:目的。随着进行的诊断成像研究的数量增加,支持这些放射学检查的镇静需求也增加了。我们的目标是(1)评估仅由儿科急诊医学(PEM)医师配备的放射镇静服务的安全性和有效性,(2)确定需要进行手术镇静的常用儿科影像学研究的频率和类型, (3)评估通常进行的放射学研究的平均镇静时间。我们对2004年的患者进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,涉及程序镇静以利于诊断成像。我们是大学附属的PEM医师小组,在工作日内在独立的城市儿童医院提供放射镇静服务。结果。在研究期间,镇静服务参加了1285次患者治疗。为1027例患者提供了深层镇静剂。对258例患者进行了中度镇静。最频繁进行影像学检查的程序镇静时间为5至183分钟。用于深层镇静的药物有65%的病例是戊巴比妥(与咪达唑仑,芬太尼或两者合用),丙泊酚为31%,氯胺酮(有或没有咪达唑仑)为4%。 86%的水合氯醛和14%的口服地西epa可达到中度镇静作用。总共成功完成了99.1%的影像学研究。由于镇静失败或不良事件发生,六项影像学研究被中止。结论5例因麻醉前评估而被认为具有高风险的患者被选择性转诊全身麻醉。我们的数据表明,由PEM医师专门负责的支持诊断影像服务的专门镇静团队可以成为成功的临床企业。该服务消耗大量资源和医生时间。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号