首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Comparing Patients Seen in Pediatric Resident Continuity Clinics and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Practices: A Study From the Continuity Research Network
【24h】

Comparing Patients Seen in Pediatric Resident Continuity Clinics and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Practices: A Study From the Continuity Research Network

机译:比较儿科住院医师连续性诊所和国家门诊医疗调查实践中的患者:来自连续性研究网络的研究

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES. The goal was to compare visit data from Continuity Research Network practices with data for a nationally representative sample of pediatric visits in practice settings from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.METHODS. A cross-sectional study comparing data for Continuity Research Network practice visits during a 1-week period in 2002 with data from the 2000 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was performed. Continuity Research Network and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data were derived from 30 patient visits per practice site for patients 22 years of age, with the primary care providers being residents and practicing pediatricians, respectively.RESULTS. Eighteen Continuity Research Network practices reported on 540 visits, compared with 32 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey physicians reporting on 792 visits. Continuity Research Network patients were more likely to be black non-Hispanic or Hispanic/Latino and to have public insurance. The top 5 reasons for visits were the same for Continuity Research Network and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey visits, although the orders varied slightly. These 5 reasons accounted for 58% of Continuity Research Network visits and 49% of National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey visits. Continuity Research Network visits were more likely to result in patient instructions to return at a specific time (78% vs 52%).CONCLUSIONS. Residents in Continuity Research Network practices provide care to more underserved patients but evaluate problems that are similar to those observed in office practices; the Continuity Research Network practices thus provide important training experiences for residents who will serve both minority and nonminority children.
机译:目标目的是将来自Continuity Research Network做法的就诊数据与全国门诊医疗调查提供的全国代表性的儿科就诊样本数据进行比较。进行了一项横断面研究,将2002年连续1周的连续性研究网络实践访问数据与2000年国家门诊医疗调查的数据进行了比较。连续性研究网络和国家门诊医疗调查数据来自每个练习站点针对22岁以下患者的30次患者就诊,主要护理提供者分别是居民和执业儿科医生。 18位连续性研究网络的实践报告了540次访问,而32位国家门诊医疗调查医生报告了792次访问。 Continuity Research Network的患者更有可能是非西班牙裔或西班牙裔/拉丁美洲裔的黑人,并且有公共保险。连续性研究网络和国家门诊医疗调查的访问的前5个原因相同,尽管顺序略有不同。这5个原因占Continuity Research Network访问量的58%,占全国门诊医疗调查的49%。连续性研究网络的访问更有可能导致患者在特定时间返回指示(78%vs 52%)。结论。连续性研究网络实践中的居民为服务不足的患者提供护理,但评估的问题与办公室实践中观察到的问题相似;因此,连续性研究网络的实践为将为少数民族和非少数民族儿童服务的居民提供了重要的培训经验。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号