...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Effects of Budesonide Inhalation Suspension Compared With Cromolyn Sodium Nebulizer Solution on Health Status and Caregiver Quality of Life in Childhood Asthma
【24h】

Effects of Budesonide Inhalation Suspension Compared With Cromolyn Sodium Nebulizer Solution on Health Status and Caregiver Quality of Life in Childhood Asthma

机译:布地奈德吸入悬浮液与克罗莫林钠雾化剂溶液相比对儿童哮喘健康状况和看护者生活质量的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. To compare the effects of 2 nebulizable controller asthma medications on caregiver and pediatric quality of life.Methods. In this 52-week, randomized trial, children aged 2 to 6 years with mild to moderate persistent asthma received budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 mg (total daily dose) once or twice daily ( n = 168) or cromolyn sodium nebulizer solution 20 mg 4 times daily ( n = 167) for 8 weeks, with dosage adjustment thereafter at the investigators’ discretion. The Pediatric Asthma Caregiver’s Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ), Compliance/Caregiver Satisfaction Questionnaire (CCSQ), Modified Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50), and Functional Status-II(R) (FS-II[R]) Questionnaire were administered at baseline and weeks 8, 28, and 52. Global assessments of ease of asthma management and child health status were obtained from caregivers and physicians at the end of the study.Results. Improvements from baseline in domain-specific (activities and emotional function) and total PACQLQ scores were greater at each time point (weeks 8, 28, and 52) for caregivers of patients treated with budesonide compared with caregivers of patients receiving cromolyn sodium. Only the budesonide group met the criterion for a clinically important improvement (≥0.5 unit change) in all PACQLQ domains by week 8, which was maintained at weeks 28 and 52. Moreover, improvements surpassed the criterion for moderate clinical importance (1.0 unit change) in all PACQLQ domains for the budesonide group, but this level of improvement was only achieved in the activities domain (at week 28) for the cromolyn sodium group. Based on the CCSQ, budesonide resulted in greater caregiver satisfaction, treatment convenience, ease of use, and compliance compared with cromolyn sodium. Thus, 90.7% of caregivers in the budesonide group were “completely or very satisfied” compared with 53.4% in the cromolyn sodium group. Over half (54.6%) of caregivers in the budesonide group rated budesonide “highly or very convenient” compared with 23% for cromolyn sodium; 77% rated budesonide “extremely or very easy” to use compared with 47% for cromolyn. Adherence with daily medication regimens was reported for 76% of children in the budesonide group compared with 57% in the cromolyn sodium group. Child health status, as indicated by mean FS-II(R) scores, showed improvements from baseline in both groups at weeks 8, 28, and 52. There was a trend for these improvements to be superior in the budesonide group. Additionally, budesonide was superior to cromolyn sodium in caregiver and physician global assessments. At the end of the study, 76% of caregivers of children receiving budesonide reported asthma management to be “a great deal easier” compared with the start of the study, and 74% rated the overall health status of their child as “much better now than 1 year ago.” In contrast, only 29% and 37% of caregivers whose children received cromolyn sodium provided these respective ratings.Conclusions. Budesonide inhalation suspension improved the quality of life for caregivers of children with asthma. Caregivers of children treated with budesonide had significantly fewer limitations in daily activities and emotional functioning compared with caregivers of children treated with cromolyn sodium nebulizer solution. The improvements in caregiver quality of life occurred earlier with budesonide compared with cromolyn sodium. Only caregivers in the budesonide group had a clinically important mean change from baseline in all PACQLQ domains by week 8. These benefits were maintained at week 52. Children treated with budesonide inhalation suspension and cromolyn sodium experienced improvements in health status, assessed using the FS-II(R). The greatest differences between treatments were seen in the disease-specific portion of the FS-II(R), which relates impairments in functional status to the child’s illness. Caregiver and physician global assessment indicated significantly better overall child health after 1 year of treatment with budesonide, supporting an improvement in health status. Clinical trials in children 4 to 16 years of age with asthma have demonstrated greater effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids versus cromolyn sodium on several clinical measures of efficacy. Measures of asthma control in this study, reported in detail elsewhere [Leflein et al. Pediatrics . 2002;109:866–872], also have shown greater improvements with budesonide therapy. Treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension resulted in a significantly lower mean rate of asthma exacerbations, significantly longer times to first asthma exacerbation, significantly longer times to first additional use of chronic asthma therapy, and significant improvements in asthma symptom scores and breakthrough medication use compared with cromolyn sodium therapy. Additionally, children receiving budesonide inhalation suspension experienced more symptom-free days and episode-free days compar
机译:目的。比较2种可雾化控制哮喘药物对护理人员和小儿生活质量的影响。在这项为期52周的随机试验中,患有轻度至中度持续性哮喘的2至6岁的儿童接受布地奈德吸入混悬液0.5 mg(每日总剂量)每天一次或两次(n = 168)或cromolyn雾化钠溶液20 mg 4次每天一次(n = 167),持续8周,然后由研究者酌情调整剂量。儿科哮喘护理者的生活质量调查表(PACQLQ),依从性/护理人员满意度调查表(CCSQ),改良的儿童健康调查问卷-家长表50(CHQ-PF50)和功能状态II(R)(FS-II [R]) )在基线以及第8、28和52周进行问卷调查。在研究结束时,从看护者和医生那里获得了哮喘控制和儿童健康状况的总体评估。与接受cromolyn钠的患者的照护者相比,布地奈德治疗的患者的照护者在每个时间点(第8、28和52周)的领域特异性(活动和情绪功能)和PACQLQ总得分相对于基线的改善更大。到第8周时,只有布地奈德组满足所有PACQLQ域的重要临床改善标准(≥0.5个单位变化),并维持在第28周和第52周。此外,改善程度超过中等临床重要性的标准(变化1.0个单位)。在布地奈德组的所有PACQLQ域中,但仅在克罗莫林钠组的活性域(第28周)达到了这一水平的改善。与cromolyn钠相比,基于CCSQ的布地奈德可提高护理人员的满意度,治疗便利性,易用性和顺应性。因此,布地奈德组中90.7%的护理人员“完全或非常满意”,而克罗莫林钠组中的护理人员为53.4%。布地奈德组中超过一半(54.6%)的护理人员将布地奈德评为“高度或非常方便”,而可可莫林钠的比例为23%; 77%的布地奈德“极其或非常容易”使用,而色酚的使用率为47%。据报道,布地奈德组76%的儿童坚持日常用药,而克罗莫林钠组为57%。如平均FS-II(R)分数所示,儿童健康状况显示两组在第8、28和52周时均较基线有所改善。布地奈德组有改善的趋势。此外,在护理人员和医生的整体评估中,布地奈德优于克罗莫林钠。在研究结束时,与开始研究相比,接受布地奈德治疗的儿童中76%的照护者称哮喘管理“非常容易”,并且74%的儿童将其总体健康状况评为“现在好得多”。比一年前。”相比之下,只有29%和37%的孩子接受了cromolyn钠的儿童提供了这些相应的评分。布地奈德吸入混悬液改善了哮喘患儿的护理人员的生活质量。与使用克罗莫林钠雾化器溶液治疗的儿童的照料者相比,使用布地奈德治疗的儿童的照料者在日常活动和情绪功能方面的限制明显更少。与克罗莫林钠相比,布地奈德更早地改善了护理人员的生活质量。到第8周时,只有布地奈德组的看护人在所有PACQLQ域中的基线均具有临床上重要的临床平均变化。这些益处在第52周时得以维持。使用FS-评估的布地奈德吸入混悬液和色甘酚钠治疗的儿童的健康状况有所改善。 II(R)。两种治疗方法之间的最大差异在于FS-II(R)的疾病特定部分,该部分将功能状态的损害与孩子的疾病联系起来。护理人员和医生的整体评估表明,使用布地奈德治疗1年后,儿童总体总体健康状况明显改善,支持了健康状况的改善。在4至16岁的哮喘儿童中进行的临床试验表明,在几种临床疗效指标上,吸入糖皮质激素相对于cromolyn钠具有更大的疗效。本研究中哮喘控制的措施,在其他地方有详细报道[Leflein等。小儿科。 2002; 109:866–872],也显示布地奈德疗法有更大的改善。与克罗莫林相比,采用布地奈德吸入混悬液治疗可显着降低平均哮喘急性发作率,显着延长首次哮喘急性发作时间,显着更长的首次慢性哮喘治疗时间以及显着改善哮喘症状评分和突破性用药钠疗法。此外,接受布地奈德吸入悬浮液治疗的儿童的无症状日数和无发作日数比较

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号