...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >A Comparative Efficacy Trial in Germany in Infants Who Received Either the Lederle/Takeda Acellular Pertussis Component DTP (DTaP) Vaccine, the Lederle Whole-Cell Component DTP Vaccine, or DT Vaccine
【24h】

A Comparative Efficacy Trial in Germany in Infants Who Received Either the Lederle/Takeda Acellular Pertussis Component DTP (DTaP) Vaccine, the Lederle Whole-Cell Component DTP Vaccine, or DT Vaccine

机译:在德国接受Lederle / Takeda无细胞百日咳成分DTP(DTaP)疫苗,Lederle全细胞成分DTP疫苗或DT疫苗的婴儿的比较功效试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background. ?The goal of the trial was to determine the efficacy of a multicomponent acellular pertussis vaccine against Bordetella illnesses in comparison with a whole-cell product and DT.Design .?In a randomized, double-blind fashion, 2- to 4-month-old infants received 4 doses of either DTP or DTaP vaccine at 3, 4.5, 6, and 15 to 18 months of age. The controls received 3 doses (3, 4.5, 15 to 18 months of age) of DT vaccine. The DTP vaccine was Lederle adsorbed vaccine (licensed in the United States) and DTaP was Lederle/Takeda adsorbed vaccine. Follow-up for vaccine efficacy started 2 weeks after the third dose (DTP/DTaP) and at the same age (6.5 months) in DT recipients. Reactogenicity of all doses of all three vaccines was documented by standardized parent diary cards. In addition, all subjects were monitored for respiratory illnesses and serious adverse events by biweekly phone calls.Results .?From May 1991 to January 1993, a total of 10?271 infants were enrolled: 8532 received either DTP or DTaP and 1739 received DT. Specific efficacy against B pertussis infections with cough ≥7 days duration was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76–88) and 72% (95% CI: 62–79) for DTP and DTaP, respectively; results for DTP and DTaP based on ≥21 days of cough with either paroxysms, whoop or posttussive vomiting (PWV) were 93% (95% CI: 89–96) and 83% (95% CI: 76–88), respectively. For DTaP vaccine, efficacy was higher after the fourth dose as compared with its efficacy after the third dose (78% vs 62% for cough ≥7 days and 85% vs 76% for cough ≥21 days with PWV). For DTP vaccine, efficacy was less varied after the third and fourth dose (78% vs 85% for cough ≥7 days and 93% vs 93% for cough ≥21 days with PWV). In contrast with DTP, the DTaP vaccine had some efficacy against B parapertussis infection (point estimate for cough ≥7 days: 31% [95% CI: ?10–56]). All vaccines were generally well-tolerated. However, side reactions were significantly less after DTaP compared with DTP.Conclusions .?Like other multicomponent acellular pertussis vaccines, the Lederle/Takeda DTaP vaccine demonstrated good efficacy against mild and typical pertussis due to B pertussis infections. Interestingly, it also may have some efficacy against B parapertussis . Based on the results of this trial, the vaccine was licensed in the United States in December 1996 for all 5 doses of the currently recommended immunization schedule in this country.
机译:背景。该试验的目的是确定与全细胞产品和DT.Design相比的多组分脱细胞百日咳多组分百日咳疫苗的功效。以随机,双盲方式进行2至4个月的研究年龄较大的婴儿在3、4.5、6和15至18个月大时接受了4剂DTP或DTaP疫苗。对照组接受了3剂(3、4.5、15至18个月大)DT疫苗。 DTP疫苗是Lederle吸附的疫苗(在美国许可),而DTaP是Lederle / Takeda吸附的疫苗。在第三次接种(DTP / DTaP)后2周开始接受疫苗效力的随访,并在DT接受者的相同年龄(6.5个月)开始。标准化的父母日记卡记录了所有三种疫苗的所有剂量的反应原性。结果,从1991年5月到1993年1月,共有10 271例婴儿入组:8532例接受了DTP或DTaP治疗,1739例接受了DT治疗。 DTP和DTaP对咳嗽≥7天的百日咳百日咳杆菌感染的特异性疗效分别为83%(95%置信区间[CI]:76-88)和72%(95%CI:62-79)。基于≥21天的阵发性,百日咳或咳嗽后呕吐(PWV)的咳嗽,DTP和DTaP的结果分别为93%(95%CI:89-96)和83%(95%CI:76-88)。对于DTaP疫苗,第四次注射后的功效高于第三次注射后的功效(PWV≥78天咳嗽≥7天的比率为62%,≥21天≥21天咳嗽的比率为85%vs 76%)。对于DTP疫苗,在第三和第四次接种后的疗效差异较小(PWV≥78天,咳嗽≥7天的比率为85%,而≥21天≥93天咳嗽的比率为93%,93%)。与DTP相比,DTaP疫苗对百日咳百日咳杆菌感染有一定疗效(咳嗽≥7天的估计点数:31%[95%CI:?10-56])。所有疫苗通常耐受良好。然而,与DTP相比,DTaP注射后的副反应明显减少。有趣的是,它也可能对百日咳百日咳杆菌有一定疗效。根据该试验的结果,该疫苗于1996年12月在美国获得许可,用于该国目前建议的所有5剂接种计划。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号