首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Use of a Single Solution for Oral Rehydration and Maintenance Therapy of Infants With Diarrhea and Mild to Moderate Dehydration
【24h】

Use of a Single Solution for Oral Rehydration and Maintenance Therapy of Infants With Diarrhea and Mild to Moderate Dehydration

机译:单一解决方案用于腹泻和轻度至中度脱水的婴儿的口服补液和维持疗法

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective . To compare the efficacy of two commonly used solutions in the rehydration of infants with mild to moderate dehydration caused by acute diarrhea in the United States.Design and setting . Double-blind, parallel-group, randomized study performed at Children's Hospital Medical Center.Patients . Sixty infant boys (≤2 years old), with mild (≤5%) or moderate (6 to 9%) dehydration caused by acute diarrhea of less than 1 week's duration were included in the study.Interventions . Infants were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either a glucose-based oral rehydration solution (ORS) (Pedialyte, Ross Laboratories, Columbus, OH) or a rice syrup solids-based ORS (Infalyte, Mead Johnson Nutritional Group, Evansville, IN). After rehydration was achieved, patients entered a maintenance phase during which, in addition to a maintenance ORS, breast milk or a soy-based formula was offered infants older than 1 year were also given a lactose-free diet.Outcome measures . Rehydration was judged clinically. Infants remained on a metabolic bed during the study in to separate and quantitate urine and stool output. Therefore, in addition to clinical outcome, we compared intake, output and apparent absorption and retention of fluid, sodium, and potassium between groups.Results . All patients were successfully rehydrated using an ORS without the use of intravenous fluids. No differences were detected between treatment groups in time to rehydration, percentage of weight gain after rehydration, consumption of ORS to achieve rehydration, or stool output. However, the apparent sodium absorption (net intake less fecal output) was greater in the Infalyte group than the Pedialyte group during the first 24 hours.Conclusion . The two maintenance oral electrolyte solutions (Pedialyte and Infalyte) most commonly used in the United States are effective as rehydration solutions for infants with mild to moderate dehydration. We speculate that a strategy for oral rehydration therapy in the United States, based on the use of a single solution during the rehydration and maintenance phase, might gain additional acceptance by practicing pediatricians and family physicians.
机译:目标。比较美国两种常用溶液在急性腹泻引起轻度至中度脱水的婴儿补液中的功效。设计与设置。在儿童医院医疗中心进行的双盲,平行分组的随机研究。这项研究包括60例婴儿男孩(≤2岁),其持续时间少于1周的急性腹泻引起的轻度(≤5%)或中度(6%至9%)脱水。婴儿被随机分配接受葡萄糖基口服补液(ORS)(Pedialyte,Ross Laboratories,Columbus,OH)或大米糖浆固体ORS(Infalyte,Mead Johnson Nutritional Group,Evansville,IN)治疗。补液完成后,患者进入维持期,在此期间,除了维持ORS之外,还为母乳或大豆配方奶粉提供了1岁以上的婴儿无乳糖饮食。根据临床判断补液。在研究期间,婴儿留在代谢床上,以分离和定量尿液和粪便的排出量。因此,除了临床结果外,我们还比较了两组之间液体,钠和钾的摄入量,输出量以及表观吸收和保留率。所有患者均使用ORS成功补液,无需使用静脉输液。在补液时间,补液后体重增加百分比,实现补液的ORS摄入量或粪便排出量方面,在治疗组之间未发现差异。然而,在最初的24小时内,Infalyte组的表观钠吸收(净摄入量减去粪便排出量)大于Pedialyte组。在美国最常用的两种维持性口服电解质溶液(Pedialyte和Infalyte)对于轻度至中度脱水的婴儿,可以作为补液有效。我们推测,基于在补液和维持阶段使用单一溶液的美国口服补液治疗策略,可能会得到执业的儿科医生和家庭医生的认可。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号