首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Atrial Overdrive Pacing for Conversion of Atrial Flutter in Children
【24h】

Atrial Overdrive Pacing for Conversion of Atrial Flutter in Children

机译:心房超速起搏治疗儿童房颤

获取原文
           

摘要

Twenty-three successive patients with 27 different episodes of sustained atrial flutter were treated with atrial pacing for conversion of the tachyarrhythmia; 15 patients with 16 episodes of atrial flutter underwent intracardiac right atrial pacing and eight patients with 11 episodes of atrial flutter were treated with transesophageal atrial pacing. Ten of sixteen episodes (63%) and eight of 11 episodes (73%) were successfully converted using intracardiac and transesophageal techniques, respectively. Mean flutter cycle length for all 27 episodes was 219 ms (mean heart rate 274 beats per minute); successful pacing conversion cycle length (n = 15) was 72% of the flutter cycle length. Hemodynamic, electrophysiologic, and roentgenographic data were not predictive of conversion by either technique. Induction of localized atrial fibrillation or failure to meet critical pacing criteria may explain pacing failures. Based on this experience, a trial of transesophageal atrial pacing for acute conversion of any episode of atrial flutter in children prior to direct current cardioversion is recommended.
机译:对连续发作的27例持续性房扑发作的23例患者,采用心房起搏治疗快速性心律失常。 15例发生16次房扑的患者行心内右心房起搏,8例合并11次房扑的患者经食道心房起搏治疗。使用心内和经食道技术分别成功转换了16次发作中的10次(63%)和11次发作中的8次(73%)。所有27次发作的平均扑动周期长度为219毫秒(平均心率274拍/分钟)。成功的起搏转换周期长度(n = 15)为颤振周期长度的72%。血流动力学,电生理学和X线照相术数据均不能预测两种技术的转换。诱发局部房颤或未能达到关键起搏标准可能是起搏失败的原因。基于此经验,建议进行经食道心房起搏的试验,以在直流电复律之前对儿童的任何房扑发作进行急性转换。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号