...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >A Prospective Study of Adolescents Who Choose Among Levonorgestrel Implant (Norplant), Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (Depo-Provera), or the Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill as Contraception
【24h】

A Prospective Study of Adolescents Who Choose Among Levonorgestrel Implant (Norplant), Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (Depo-Provera), or the Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill as Contraception

机译:对青少年选择左炔诺孕酮植入物(Norplant),醋酸甲羟孕酮(Depo-Provera)或口服避孕药联合避孕的青少年进行的前瞻性研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives. Levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) and medroxyprogesterone acetate injections (Depo-Provera) represent additional contraception options for adolescents. The purpose of this study was to examine prospectively clinical profiles among adolescents who chose one of the two long-term contraceptives compared with profiles among those who chose the combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP).Methods. Girls who needed contraception and did not require confidentiality were presented with a contraceptive menu consisting of Norplant (n = 58), Depo-Provera (n = 66), or OCP (n = 75). At baseline and follow-up visits over 6 months, patients were interviewed regarding gynecologic history, side effect symptoms, and satisfaction. The average age of subjects was 15.5 years (range 11 to 20 years); 66% were African-American and 34% white.Results. Significantly more teens who chose Depo-Provera (73%) reported having used some method of birth control previously than those selecting either Norplant (30%) or OCP (26%). Adolescents who chose either Norplant (34%) or Depo-Provera (43%) were significantly more likely to have been pregnant previously than those choosing OCP (12%). Those selecting Depo-Provera were significantly more likely to report a history of genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis (42%) than those in the other two contraceptive groups (22%). Prevalences of reported recent depression and fatigue before initiation of treatment were high, exceeding 35% across the three groups. A total of 105 and 40 adolescents were assessed at 3 and 6 months, respectively. At follow-up, more than 80% of OCP users maintained regular menstrual cycles, whereas over 80% of those choosing Norplant or Depo-Provera had disrupted cycles. Complaints of nausea and dizziness among Norplant users and fatigue among Depo-Provera and OCP users increased significantly between the baseline and follow-up visits. Reports of local reactions to the Norplant device were common but not clinically significant. Blood pressure readings, facial acne, and body mass index did not change over time in any treatment group. Subjects in the Norplant and Depo-Provera groups appreciated freedom from daily compliance to maintain contraceptive effectiveness and the "hidden" nature of the method. Appointment compliance at the end of 6 months was 78% for Depo-Provera, 40% for Norplant, and 46% for OCP.Conclusions. The implant and injection forms of contraception appear to be especially popular among girls with previous pregnancies or birth control use. The common occurrences of medical symptoms and sexually transmitted diseases before initiation of therapy underscore the importance of baseline evaluation. Norplant users may be warned about nausea and dizziness as well as minor local symptoms around the insertion site and unpredictable uterine bleeding patterns. Adolescent patients choosing Depo-Provera may expect amenorrhea by the end of 6 months of therapy along with possible fatigue. Early intervention may be needed with adolescents who choose Norplant or OCP to encourage better compliance with follow-up appointments.
机译:目标。左炔诺孕酮植入物(Norplant)和醋酸甲羟孕酮注射液(Depo-Provera)代表了青少年的其他避孕选择。这项研究的目的是检验与选择两种口服避孕药(OCP)的青少年相比,选择两种长期避孕药之一的青少年的前瞻性临床概况。需要避孕且不需要保密的女孩将获得由Norplant(n = 58),Depo-Provera(n = 66)或OCP(n = 75)组成的避孕菜单。在6个月以上的基线和随访中,就妇科病史,副作用症状和满意度对患者进行了采访。受试者的平均年龄为15.5岁(范围为11至20岁); 66%是非裔美国人,34%是白人。与选择Norplant(30%)或OCP(26%)的青少年相比,选择Depo-Provera的青少年(73%)之前显着更多的青少年报告过曾经使用过某些节育方法。与选择OCP的青少年(12%)相比,选择Norplant(34%)或Propo-Provera(43%)的青少年以前怀孕的可能性要高得多。与其他两个避孕组(22%)相比,选择Depo-Provera的人报告沙眼衣原体生殖器感染史的可能性更高(42%)。据报道,在开始治疗之前,最近的抑郁和疲劳患病率很高,三组中超过35%。分别在3个月和6个月评估了105名青少年和40名青少年。在随访中,超过80%的OCP使用者保持了正常的月经周期,而选择Norplant或Depo-Provera的使用者中有80%以上的人中断了月经周期。在基线和随访期间,Norplant使用者的恶心和头晕投诉以及Depo-Provera和OCP使用者的疲劳明显增加。关于Norplant装置局部反应的报道很普遍,但在临床上并不重要。任何治疗组的血压读数,面部痤疮和体重指数均未随时间变化。 Norplant和Depo-Provera组的受试者赞赏摆脱日常服从以保持避孕效果以及该方法的“隐藏”性质。到6个月末,Depo-Provera的预约依从率为78%,Norplant为40%,OCP为46%。避孕的植入和注射形式似乎在以前怀孕或节育的女孩中特别流行。在开始治疗之前,医学症状和性传播疾病的普遍发生凸显了基线评估的重要性。可能会警告Norplant用户有关恶心和头晕以及插入部位周围的轻微局部症状和无法预测的子宫出血模式。选择Depo-Provera的青春期患者可能会在治疗6个月后出现闭经,并可能出现疲劳。选择Norplant或OCP的青少年可能需要早期干预,以鼓励他们更好地遵守随访预约。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号