...
首页> 外文期刊>Sensors >Improved Measurement of Blood Pressure by Extraction of Characteristic Features from the Cuff Oscillometric Waveform
【24h】

Improved Measurement of Blood Pressure by Extraction of Characteristic Features from the Cuff Oscillometric Waveform

机译:从袖带示波波形中提取特征来改进血压测量

获取原文
           

摘要

We present a novel approach to improve the estimation of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from oscillometric waveform data using variable characteristic ratios between SBP and DBP with mean arterial pressure (MAP). This was verified in 25 healthy subjects, aged 28 ± 5 years. The multiple linear regression (MLR) and support vector regression (SVR) models were used to examine the relationship between the SBP and the DBP ratio with ten features extracted from the oscillometric waveform envelope (OWE). An automatic algorithm based on relative changes in the cuff pressure and neighbouring oscillometric pulses was proposed to remove outlier points caused by movement artifacts. Substantial reduction in the mean and standard deviation of the blood pressure estimation errors were obtained upon artifact removal. Using the sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) approach, we were able to achieve a significant reduction in the mean and standard deviation of differences between the estimated SBP values and the reference scoring (MLR: mean ± SD = −0.3 ± 5.8 mmHg; SVR and −0.6 ± 5.4 mmHg) with only two features, i.e., Ratio2 and Area3, as compared to the conventional maximum amplitude algorithm (MAA) method (mean ± SD = −1.6 ± 8.6 mmHg). Comparing the performance of both MLR and SVR models, our results showed that the MLR model was able to achieve comparable performance to that of the SVR model despite its simplicity.
机译:我们提出了一种新颖的方法,可通过使用脉动血压和舒张压之间的可变特征比率与平均动脉压(MAP)来从示波波形数据改进对收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)的估计。这在25位年龄为28±5岁的健康受试者中得到了验证。使用多元线性回归(MLR)和支持向量回归(SVR)模型来检查SBP与DBP比率之间的关系,并从示波波形包络(OWE)中提取十个特征。提出了一种基于袖带压力和相邻示波脉冲相对变化的自动算法,以消除运动伪影引起的异常点。去除伪影后,血压估计误差的平均值和标准偏差显着降低。使用顺序前向浮动选择(SFFS)方法,我们能够显着降低估计的SBP值和参考评分之间的差异的平均值和标准偏差(MLR:平均值±SD = -0.3±5.8 mmHg; SVR和-0.6±5.4 mmHg)仅具有两个特征,即Ratio 2 和Area 3 ,与传统的最大幅度算法(MAA)方法相比(平均值±SD = -1.6±8.6毫米汞柱)。比较MLR和SVR模型的性能,我们的结果表明,MLR模型尽管简单,但仍可实现与SVR模型相当的性能。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号