首页> 外文期刊>Sensors >Performance of Three Reflectance Calibration Methods for Airborne Hyperspectral Spectrometer Data
【24h】

Performance of Three Reflectance Calibration Methods for Airborne Hyperspectral Spectrometer Data

机译:机载高光谱光谱仪数据的三种反射率校准方法的性能

获取原文
           

摘要

In this study, the performances and accuracies of three methods for converting airborne hyperspectral spectrometer data to reflectance factors were characterized and compared. The “reflectance mode (RM)” method, which calibrates a spectrometer against a white reference panel prior to mounting on an aircraft, resulted in spectral reflectance retrievals that were biased and distorted. The magnitudes of these bias errors and distortions varied significantly, depending on time of day and length of the flight campaign. The “linear-interpolation (LI)” method, which converts airborne spectrometer data by taking a ratio of linearly-interpolated reference values from the preflight and post-flight reference panel readings, resulted in precise, but inaccurate reflectance retrievals. These reflectance spectra were not distorted, but were subject to bias errors of varying magnitudes dependent on the flight duration length. The “continuous panel (CP)” method uses a multi-band radiometer to obtain continuous measurements over a reference panel throughout the flight campaign, in order to adjust the magnitudes of the linear-interpolated reference values from the preflight and post-flight reference panel readings. Airborne hyperspectral reflectance retrievals obtained using this method were found to be the most accurate and reliable reflectance calibration method. The performances of the CP method in retrieving accurate reflectance factors were consistent throughout time of day and for various flight durations. Based on the dataset analyzed in this study, the uncertainty of the CP method has been estimated to be 0.0025 ± 0.0005 reflectance units for the wavelength regions not affected by atmospheric absorptions. The RM method can produce reasonable results only for a very short-term flight (e.g., < 15 minutes) conducted around a local solar noon. The flight duration should be kept shorter than 30 minutes for the LI method to produce results with reasonable accuracies. An important advantage of the CP method is that the method can be used for long-duration flight campaigns (e.g., 1-2 hours). Although this study focused on reflectance calibration of airborne spectrometer data, the methods evaluated in this study and the results obtained are directly applicable to ground spectrometer measurements.
机译:在这项研究中,表征和比较了三种将机载高光谱光谱仪数据转换为反射系数的方法的性能和准确性。 “反射模式(RM)”方法是在安装在飞机上之前先将光谱仪相对于白色基准面板进行校准,从而导致光谱反射率的获取出现偏差和失真。这些偏差和畸变的幅度根据一天中的时间和飞行时间的长短而有很大差异。 “线性插值(LI)”方法通过从飞行前和飞行后参考面板读数中获取线性插值参考值的比率来转换机载光谱仪数据,导致获得精确但不准确的反射率。这些反射光谱没有失真,但是会受到取决于飞行持续时间长度的不同幅度的偏差误差的影响。 “连续面板(CP)”方法使用多波段辐射计在整个飞行活动中获取参考面板上的连续测量值,以便从飞行前和飞行后参考面板调整线性插值参考值的大小。阅读。发现使用此方法获得的机载高光谱反射率检索是最准确和可靠的反射率校准方法。 CP方法在获取准确的反射系数方面的性能在一天中的整个时间以及各种飞行持续时间内都是一致的。根据此研究中分析的数据集,对于不受大气吸收影响的波长区域,CP方法的不确定度估计为0.0025±0.0005反射率单位。 RM方法仅对于在当地太阳正午进行的非常短期的飞行(例如,<15分钟)会产生合理的结果。飞行时间应保持在30分钟以内,以使LI方法产生具有合理准确性的结果。 CP方法的重要优点是该方法可用于长时间的飞行战役(例如1-2小时)。尽管本研究的重点是机载光谱仪数据的反射率校准,但本研究中评估的方法和获得的结果直接适用于地面光谱仪的测量。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号