首页> 外文期刊>Sensors >Analysis of the Air Flow Generated by an Air-Assisted Sprayer Equipped with Two Axial Fans Using a 3D Sonic Anemometer
【24h】

Analysis of the Air Flow Generated by an Air-Assisted Sprayer Equipped with Two Axial Fans Using a 3D Sonic Anemometer

机译:使用3D声波风速计分析配备有两个轴流风扇的空气辅助喷雾器产生的气流

获取原文
           

摘要

The flow of air generated by a new design of air assisted sprayer equipped with two axial fans of reversed rotation was analyzed. For this goal, a 3D sonic anemometer has been used (accuracy: 1.5%; measurement range: 0 to 45 m/s). The study was divided into a static test and a dynamic test. During the static test, the air velocity in the working vicinity of the sprayer was measured considering the following machine configurations: (1) one activated fan regulated at three air flows (machine working as a traditional sprayer); (2) two activated fans regulated at three air flows for each fan. In the static test 72 measurement points were considered. The location of the measurement points was as follow: left and right sides of the sprayer; three sections of measurement (A, B and C); three measurement distances from the shaft of the machine (1.5 m, 2.5 m and 3.5 m); and four measurement heights (1 m, 2 m, 3 m and 4 m). The static test results have shown significant differences in the module and the vertical angle of the air velocity vector in function of the regulations of the sprayer. In the dynamic test, the air velocity was measured at 2.5 m from the axis of the sprayer considering four measurement heights (1 m, 2 m, 3 m and 4 m). In this test, the sprayer regulations were: one or two activated fans; one air flow for each fan; forward speed of 2.8 km/h. The use of one fan (back) or two fans (back and front) produced significant differences on the duration of the presence of wind in the measurement point and on the direction of the air velocity vector. The module of the air velocity vector was not affected by the number of activated fans.
机译:分析了由配备有两个反向旋转轴流风扇的新型空气辅助喷雾器产生的气流。为此,使用了3D声波风速计(精度:1.5%;测量范围:0至45 m / s)。该研究分为静态测试和动态测试。在静态测试过程中,在考虑以下机器配置的情况下测量了喷雾器工作区域内的空气速度:(1)一个调节了三种气流的主动风扇(该机器作为传统喷雾器工作); (2)两个激活的风扇,每个风扇调节三个气流。在静态测试中,考虑了72个测量点。测量点的位置如下:喷雾器的左侧和右侧;三个测量部分(A,B和C);与机器轴的三个测量距离(1.5 m,2.5 m和3.5 m);和四个测量高度(1 m,2 m,3 m和4 m)。静态测试结果表明,根据喷涂机的规定,模块和风速矢量的垂直角度存在明显差异。在动态测试中,考虑到四个测量高度(1 m,2 m,3 m和4 m),在距喷涂机轴线2.5 m处测量了空气速度。在该测试中,喷涂机的规定是:一或两个激活的风扇;每个风扇一个气流;前进速度为2.8 km / h。使用一个风扇(后部)或两个风扇(后部和前部)在测量点上存在风的持续时间和风速矢量的方向上产生了显着差异。风速矢量的模块不受激活的风扇数量的影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号