...
首页> 外文期刊>Nucleic acids research >Making your database available through Wikipedia: the pros and cons
【24h】

Making your database available through Wikipedia: the pros and cons

机译:通过Wikipedia使您的数据库可用:利弊

获取原文

摘要

Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, is the most famous wiki in use today. It contains over 3.7 million pages of content; with many pages written on scientific subject matters that include peer-reviewed citations, yet are written in an accessible manner and generally reflect the consensus opinion of the community. In this, the 19th Annual Database Issue of Nucleic Acids Research, there are 11 articles that describe the use of a wiki in relation to a biological database. In this commentary, we discuss how biological databases can be integrated with Wikipedia, thereby utilising the pre-existing infrastructure, tools and above all, large community of authors (or Wikipedians). The limitations to the content that can be included in Wikipedia are highlighted, with examples drawn from articles found in this issue and other wiki-based resources, indicating why other wiki solutions are necessary. We discuss the merits of using open wikis, like Wikipedia, versus other models, with particular reference to potential vandalism. Finally, we raise the question about the future role of dedicated database biocurators in context of the thousands of crowdsourced, community annotations that are now being stored in wikis.
机译:维基百科,在线百科全书,是当今使用最著名的维基。它包含超过370万页的内容;关于科学主题的许多页面,包括经过同行评审的引文,却以易于访问的方式撰写,通常反映出社区的共识。在此,《核酸研究》第19届年度数据库发行中,有11篇文章描述了与生物数据库相关的Wiki的用法。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了如何将生物数据库与Wikipedia集成在一起,从而利用现有的基础架构,工具以及最重要的是大型的作者社区(或Wikipedians)。突出显示了可包含在Wikipedia中的内容的局限性,并列举了本期文章和其他基于Wiki的资源中的示例,指出了为什么需要其他Wiki解决方案。我们讨论了使用开放式Wiki(如Wikipedia)与其他模型的优点,并特别提到了潜在的破坏行为。最后,我们提出了一个问题,即在目前存储在Wiki中的成千上万的众包社区注释的背景下,专用数据库生物管理程序的未来作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号