首页> 外文期刊>MATEC Web of Conferences >Wear Mechanism of Multilayer AlCrWN/AlCrWSiN-coatings on Cemented Carbide Tools Prepared by Arc Ion Plating in Dry Cutting of Hardened Sintered Steel
【24h】

Wear Mechanism of Multilayer AlCrWN/AlCrWSiN-coatings on Cemented Carbide Tools Prepared by Arc Ion Plating in Dry Cutting of Hardened Sintered Steel

机译:硬质合金干切削中电弧离子镀制备硬质合金刀具上多层AlCrWN / AlCrWSiN涂层的磨损机理

获取原文
       

摘要

In this study, to clarify the wear mechanism of the multilayer AlCrWN/AlCrWSiN-coated tool in cutting of hardened sintered steel, the rate of wear in the cutting of hardened sintered steel using three types of coated tools was investigated. The Type I tool had a single layer (Al60, Cr25, W15)N coating film, the Type II tool had a single layer (Al53, Cr23, W14, Si10)N coating film and the Type III tool had a multilayer (Al60, Cr25, W15)N/(Al53, Cr23, W14, Si10)N-coating film. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation and electron dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) mapping analysis of the abraded surface of the coating film were performed. The following results were obtained: 1) The wear rate of the Type III tool was the slowest. 2) The area of the worn surface on the rake face “S” and the contact length between the rake face and the chip “D” were measured. Comparing the three types of coated tools, both the “S” and the “D” of Type I tool were the smallest, and those of Type II tool were the largest. 3) The main wear mechanism of Type II and Type III tool showed abrasive wear. However, the main wear mechanism of the Type I tool was both abrasive wear and adhesion wear. 4) The critical scratch load of the Type I tool, 81 N, was lower than that of the Type II or the Type III tool, over 130 N. Therefore, comparing the Type I and Type III tools, due to the wear mechanism of the Type 1 tool being both abrasive wear and adhesion wear, the wear rate of the Type I tool, which has the lower critical scratch load, was slower.
机译:在这项研究中,为弄清多层AlCrWN / AlCrWSiN涂层刀具在淬火烧结钢切削中的磨损机理,研究了使用三种类型的涂层刀具切削淬火烧结钢的磨损率。 I型工具具有单层(Al60,Cr25,W15)N涂膜,II型工具具有单层(Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)N涂膜,III型工具具有多层(Al60, Cr25,W15)N /(Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)N涂膜。对涂膜的磨损表面进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察和电子色散X射线能谱(EDS)作图分析。获得以下结果:1)III型工具的磨损速率最慢。 2)测量前刀面“ S”上的磨损表面的面积以及前刀面与切屑“ D”之间的接触长度。比较三种涂层工具,I型工具的“ S”和“ D”最小,而II型工具的最大。 3)II型和III型工具的主要磨损机理为磨料磨损。但是,I型工具的主要磨损机理是磨料磨损和粘附磨损。 4)I型工具的临界刮擦载荷为81 N,低于II型或III型工具的临界刮擦载荷,超过130N。因此,比较I型和III型工具的磨损机理是因为由于类型1的工具既有磨料磨损又有粘附性磨损,因此具有较低的临界刮擦负荷的类型I的工具的磨损速度较慢。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号