...
首页> 外文期刊>MATEC Web of Conferences >Evaluation of an OBCE Conversion Contract in a Large-scale Oil and Gas Project
【24h】

Evaluation of an OBCE Conversion Contract in a Large-scale Oil and Gas Project

机译:大型油气项目中OBCE转换合同的评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Billion-dollar investments are quite common in oil and gas industry and owners generally prefer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC) contracts since they would like to minimize their risks and guarantee the most consistent project cost and shortest timeline scheme. Considering the size of contracts, owners are unsurprisingly seeking an ideal tender awarding method to avoid deviation from project schedule or budget and get the maximum benefit for them. They may prefer to award the EPC contract directly (i), have a front-end engineering design (FEED) study done first and award the EPC contract afterwards (ii), or set up a convertible contract and convert it to EPC after an open book cost estimate (OBCE) process (iii). It is a question of concern which option for large-scale oil and gas projects is the most favourable. As a case study, outcomes of a project which was administrated with a conversion type of contract will be reviewed in detail, and a number of principles based on lessons learned will be listed. Thus, the authors aim to provide a verifying approach for the interpretation of EPC conversion type contract management based on analysis of the distinguishing features of large-scale oil and gas projects.
机译:十亿美元的投资在石油和天然气行业非常普遍,业主通常更喜欢工程,采购,建筑(EPC)合同,因为他们希望最大程度地降低风险并保证最一致的项目成本和最短的时间表。考虑到合同的规模,业主毫不奇怪地寻求一种理想的招标方式,以避免偏离项目进度或预算并为他们获得最大的利益。他们可能更喜欢直接授予EPC合同(i),先进行前端工程设计(FEED)研究,然后再授予EPC合同(ii),或者建立可转换合同并在开放后将其转换为EPC帐面成本估算(OBCE)流程(iii)。一个令人关注的问题是,对于大型石油和天然气项目,哪种选择是最有利的。作为案例研究,将详细审查以转换类型的合同管理的项目结果,并列出一些基于经验教训的原则。因此,作者旨在通过分析大型油气项目的显着特征,为EPC转换类型合同管理的解释提供一种验证方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号