...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Feelings-of-Warmth Increase More Abruptly for Verbal Riddles Solved With in Contrast to Without Aha! Experience
【24h】

Feelings-of-Warmth Increase More Abruptly for Verbal Riddles Solved With in Contrast to Without Aha! Experience

机译:与没有Aha相比,解决了的言语谜语的温暖感觉突然增加了!经验

获取原文
           

摘要

When we are confronted with a new problem, we typically try to apply strategies that have worked in the past and which usually lead closer to the solution incrementally. However, sometimes, either during a problem-solving attempt that does not seem to lead closer to the solution, or when we have given up on problem-solving for the moment, the solution seems to appear out of nowhere. This is often called a moment of insight. Whereas the cognitive processes of getting closer to the solution are still unknown for insight problem-solving, there are two diverging theories on the subjective feeling of getting closer to the solution: (1) One that states that an intuitive feeling of closeness to the solution increases slowly, but incrementally, before it surpasses the threshold to consciousness and becomes verbalizable (=insight) (continuous approach), and (2) another that proposes that the feeling of closeness to the solution does not increase before it exceeds the threshold to consciousness (discontinuous approach). Here, we investigated the subjective feeling of closeness to the solution, assessed as feeling-of-warmth (FoW), its relationship to solving the problem versus being presented with it and whether a feeling of Aha! was experienced. Additionally, we tested whether Aha! experiences are more likely when the problem is solved actively by the participant or presented to the participant after an unsuccessful problem-solving attempt, and whether the frequency of Aha! experiences correlates with problem difficulty. To our knowledge, this is the first study combining the CRAT with FoW assessments for the named conditions (solved/unsolved, three difficulty levels, Aha!o Aha!). We used a verbal problem-solving task, the Compound Remote Associates Task (CRAT). Our data revealed that Aha! experiences were more often reported for solutions generated by the participant compared to solutions presented after unsuccessful problem-solving. Moreover, FoW curves showed a steeper increase for the last two FoW ratings when problems were solved with Aha! in contrast to without Aha!. Based on this observation, we provide a preliminary explanation for the underlying cognitive process of solving CRA problems via insight.
机译:当我们面对一个新问题时,我们通常会尝试应用过去有效的策略,这些策略通常会逐步接近解决方案。但是,有时,在解决问题的尝试似乎无法接近解决方案的过程中,或者当我们暂时放弃解决问题的解决方案时,解决方案似乎无处不在。这通常称为洞察力时刻。尽管对于解决问题的洞察力而言,接近解决方案的认知过程仍是未知的,但关于解决方案的主观感觉,存在两种不同的理论:(1)指出接近解决方案的直观感觉在它逐渐超过意识的阈值并成为可言化的(=洞察力)(连续方法)之前,它缓慢地,逐渐地增加;(2)另一种认为接近溶液的感觉在它超过意识的阈值之前不会增加(不连续的方法)。在这里,我们调查了接近解决方案的主观感觉,评估为温暖感(FoW),其与解决问题的关系(而不是与问题一起呈现)以及是否具有Aha!经验丰富。此外,我们测试了Aha!当问题由参与者积极解决或在未成功解决问题后呈现给参与者,以及是否出现Aha!的频率,则更有可能获得经验。经验与问题难度相关。据我们所知,这是针对命名条件(解决/未解决,三个难度级别,Aha!/ no Aha!)的CRAT与FoW评估相结合的第一项研究。我们使用了一个口头的解决问题的任务,即复合远程关联任务(CRAT)。我们的数据显示,阿哈!与未成功解决问题后提出的解决方案相比,参与者生成的解决方案的经验更多。此外,当问题通过Aha!解决后,FoW曲线显示最近两个FoW等级的陡峭上升。与没有阿哈!基于此观察,我们为通过洞察力解决CRA问题的潜在认知过程提供了初步解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号