首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Commentary: But Is It really Art? The Classification of Images as a??Arta??/a??Not Arta?? and Correlation with Appraisal and Viewer Interpersonal Differences
【24h】

Commentary: But Is It really Art? The Classification of Images as a??Arta??/a??Not Arta?? and Correlation with Appraisal and Viewer Interpersonal Differences

机译:评论:但这真的是艺术吗?图像分类为“ Arta” /“不是Arta”与评估和观看者人际差异的关联

获取原文
       

摘要

Scientific aesthetics aims to understand the creation and appreciation of aesthetics and art using scientific methods devised to yield valid and reliable empirical evidence. The pursuit of such evidence, as in other domains of science, has made of the laboratory an indispensable research environment, and of laboratory experimental procedures the preferred means to conduct research (Fechner, 1876; Külpe, 1907; Valentine, 1913). In the laboratory, reproductions of artworks have often been used as stimuli. Sometimes because the object of study is the experience of these as artworks, other times because the object of study is an aesthetic dimension (e.g., balance) along which they vary systematically (Pearce et al., 2016). In both cases it is assumed that the artistic status of the stimuli is relevant to participants' responses, and that participants actually do regard those stimuli as artworks.
机译:科学美学旨在使用旨在产生有效和可靠的经验证据的科学方法来理解美学和艺术的创造和欣赏。像在其他科学领域一样,对此类证据的追求使实验室成为必不可少的研究环境,而实验室实验程序成为进行研究的首选手段(Fechner,1876;Külpe,1907; Valentine,1913)。在实验室中,艺术品的复制品经常被用作刺激。有时是因为研究的对象是这些艺术品的体验,而有时是因为研究的对象是审美维度(例如,平衡),它们在此系统地变化(Pearce et al。,2016)。在这两种情况下,都假定刺激的艺术地位与参与者的反应有关,并且参与者实际上确实将这些刺激视为艺术品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号