首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits
【24h】

Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits

机译:评估抽象艺术:术语使用,主观评价,图像属性和人格特征之间的关系

获取原文
           

摘要

One of the major challenges in experimental aesthetics is the uncertainty of the terminology used in experiments. In this study, we recorded terms that are spontaneously used by participants to describe abstract artworks and studied their relation to the second-order statistical image properties of the same artworks (Experiment 1). We found that the usage frequency of some structure-describing terms correlates with statistical image properties, such as PHOG Self-Similarity, Anisotropy and Complexity. Additionally, emotion-associated terms correlate with measured color values. Next, based on the most frequently used terms, we created five different rating scales (Experiment 2) and obtained ratings of participants for the abstract paintings on these scales. We found significant correlations between descriptive score ratings (e.g., between structure and subjective complexity), between evaluative and descriptive score ratings (e.g., between preference and subjective complexity/interest) and between descriptive score ratings and statistical image properties (e.g., between interest and PHOG Self-Similarity, Complexity and Anisotropy). Additionally, we determined the participants’ personality traits as described in the ‘Big Five Inventory’ (Goldberg, 1990; Rammstedt and John, 2005) and correlated them with the ratings and preferences of individual participants. Participants with higher scores for Neuroticism showed preferences for objectively more complex images, as well as a different notion of the term complex when compared with participants with lower scores for Neuroticism. In conclusion, this study demonstrates an association between objectively measured image properties and the subjective terms that participants use to describe or evaluate abstract artworks. Moreover, our results suggest that the description of abstract artworks, their evaluation and the preference of participants for their low-level statistical properties are linked to personality traits.
机译:实验美学的主要挑战之一是实验中所用术语的不确定性。在这项研究中,我们记录了参与者自发使用的术语来描述抽象艺术品,并研究了它们与同一艺术品的二阶统计图像特性的关系(实验1)。我们发现,一些描述结构的术语的使用频率与统计图像属性相关,例如PHOG自相似性,各向异性和复杂性。另外,与情感相关的术语与测量的颜色值相关。接下来,根据最常用的术语,我们创建了五个不同的等级量表(实验2),并在这些等级上获得了抽象绘画参与者的等级。我们发现描述性评分等级(例如,结构和主观复杂性之间),评估性和描述性评分等级(例如,偏好和主观复杂性/兴趣之间)之间的显着相关性,以及描述性评分等级和统计图像属性(例如,兴趣和兴趣之间的显着相关性) PHOG自相似性,复杂性和各向异性)。此外,我们确定了参与者的人格特质,如“五大清单”(Goldberg,1990年; Rammstedt和John,2005年)中所述,并将其与个体参与者的等级和偏好相关联。与神经质得分较低的参与者相比,神经质得分较高的参与者表现出对客观更复杂图像的偏爱,并且对复杂一词的偏好有所不同。总之,本研究证明了客观测量的图像特性与参与者用来描述或评估抽象艺术品的主观术语之间的关联。此外,我们的结果表明,抽象艺术品的描述,其评价以及参与者对低水平统计特性的偏好与人格特质相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号