...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Context as Relevance-Driven Abduction and Charitable Satisficing
【24h】

Context as Relevance-Driven Abduction and Charitable Satisficing

机译:关联驱动诱拐和慈善满意度

获取原文
           

摘要

It has been widely assumed that the full meaning of a linguistic expression can be grasped only within a situation, the context of the utterance. There is even agreement that certain factors within the situation are particularly significant, including gestures and facial expressions of the participants, their social roles, the setting of the exchange, the objects surrounding the participants, the linguistic, cultural and educational backgrounds of the participants, their beliefs, including those concerning the situation, the social procedures and conventions that regulate the situation. Finally, there is some agreement that context is dynamic, reflexive (the speakers are mutually aware of their beliefs), not limited to linguistics actions, and last but not least, a psychological construct. This definition of context is not (very) controversial, but it leaves out two major problems, which will be addressed in this paper: how is context arrived at? And, since a perfectly natural interpretation of the above definition could be that the context of each utterance is the entire universe, how is the relevant context delimited? Four related concepts will provide the answer to both questions: abductive reasoning, driven by relevance and cooperation, and bounded rationality and the principle of charity. Simply put, context is derived abductively by the speakers assuming that for the speakers to behave the way they behave and do so rationally, a given context must be available to them. The context is bounded by the simple requirement that speakers not try to optimize their interpretation/calculation, but rather satisfice, i.e., find the first acceptable solution and by the need to follow the principle of charity, which forces intersubjective agreement. Thus, abductive reasoning and bounded rationality will be shown to be sufficient to calculate the relevant context of utterances (or other rationality-driven interactions) and to effectively delimit the potentially infinite search space that must be explored to do so.
机译:人们普遍认为,语言表达的全部含义只能在某种情况下,话语的上下文中掌握。甚至达成共识,情况中的某些因素尤其重要,包括参与者的手势和面部表情,他们的社会角色,交流的环境,参与者周围的物体,参与者的语言,文化和教育背景,他们的信念,包括有关局势的信念,规范局势的社会程序和公约。最后,人们达成了这样的共识,即语境是动态的,反身的(说话者相互了解自己的信仰),不仅限于语言学上的动作,而且最后但并非最不重要的是一种心理建构。上下文的定义不是(非常)有争议的,但是它排除了两个主要问题,本文将要解决:上下文是如何得出的?并且,由于对上述定义的完全自然的解释可能是每种话语的上下文都是整个宇宙,因此如何界定相关上下文?四个相关概念将为这两个问题提供答案:在相关性和合作性驱动下的归纳推理,以及有限理性和慈善原则。简而言之,假设说话者按照他们的行为方式进行行为并理性地进行行为,那么说话者会从中归纳出一定的上下文,他们必须可以使用给定的上下文。上下文受以下简单条件的限制:说话者不要试图优化他们的解释/计算,而是要满足,即找到第一个可以接受的解决方案,并且需要遵循慈善原则,这迫使主体间达成共识。因此,将证明归纳推理和有限理性足以计算话语(或其他理性驱动的相互作用)的相关上下文并有效地界定必须探索的无限搜索空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号