...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Syntactic flexibility and planning scope: the effect of verb bias on advance planning during sentence recall
【24h】

Syntactic flexibility and planning scope: the effect of verb bias on advance planning during sentence recall

机译:句法灵活性和计划范围:动词偏向对句子回忆过程中提前计划的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In sentence production, grammatical advance planning scope depends on contextual factors (e.g., time pressure), linguistic factors (e.g., ease of structural processing), and cognitive factors (e.g., production speed). The present study tests the influence of the availability of multiple syntactic alternatives (i.e., syntactic flexibility) on the scope of advance planning during the recall of Dutch dative phrases. We manipulated syntactic flexibility by using verbs with a strong bias or a weak bias toward one structural alternative in sentence frames accepting both verbs (e.g., strong/weak bias: De ober schotelt/serveert de klant de maaltijd [voor] “The waiter dishes out/serves the customer the meal”). To assess lexical planning scope, we varied the frequency of the first post-verbal noun (N1, Experiment 1) or the second post-verbal noun (N2, Experiment 2). In each experiment, 36 speakers produced the verb phrases in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm. On each trial, they read a sentence presented one word at a time, performed a short distractor task, and then saw a sentence preamble (e.g., De ober…) which they had to complete to form the presented sentence. Onset latencies were compared using linear mixed effects models. N1 frequency did not produce any effects. N2 frequency only affected sentence onsets in the weak verb bias condition and especially in slow speakers. These findings highlight the dependency of planning scope during sentence recall on the grammatical properties of the verb and the frequency of post-verbal nouns. Implications for utterance planning in everyday speech are discussed.
机译:在句子生产中,语法超前计划的范围取决于上下文因素(例如时间压力),语言因素(例如结构处理的难易程度)和认知因素(例如生产速度)。本研究测试了在调用荷兰语宾语短语时,多种句法替代方法(即句法灵活性)的可用性对预先计划范围的影响。我们通过在接受两个动词的句子框架中使用偏向于一个结构替代词的偏向或偏向的动词来操纵句法灵活性(例如,偏向/偏向:De ober schotelt / serveert de klant de maaltijd [voor] /为客户提供餐点”)。为了评估词汇计划的范围,我们改变了第一个后语言名词(N1,实验1)或第二个后语言名词(N2,实验2)的频率。在每个实验中,有36位演讲者以快速串行视觉呈现(RSVP)范例制作了动词短语。在每次审判中,他们每次读一个陈述一个单词的句子,执行简短的干扰项任务,然后查看句子序言(例如De ober…),他们必须完成该序言才能构成陈述的句子。使用线性混合效应模型比较发作潜伏期。 N1频率没有产生任何影响。 N2频率仅影响弱动词偏见条件下的句子发作,尤其是在慢语者中。这些发现凸显了句子回忆过程中计划范围对动词语法特性和后动词名词频率的依赖性。讨论了日常语音中话语计划的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号