...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?
【24h】

The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?

机译:百叶帘效应:偏爱零差异或零倾斜?

获取原文
           

摘要

When periodic stimuli such as vertical sinewave gratings are presented to the two eyes, the initial stage of disparity estimation yields multiple solutions at multiple depths. The solutions are all frontoparallel when the sinewaves have the same spatial frequency; they are all slanted when the sinewaves have quite different frequencies. Despite multiple solutions, humans perceive only one depth in each visual direction: a single frontoparallel plane when the frequencies are the same and a series of small slanted planes—Venetian blinds—when the frequencies are quite different. These percepts are consistent with a preference for solutions that minimize absolute disparity or overall slant. The preference for minimum disparity and minimum slant are identical for gaze at zero eccentricity; we dissociated the predictions of the two by measuring the occurrence of Venetian blinds when the stimuli were viewed in eccentric gaze. The results were generally quite consistent with a zero-disparity preference (Experiment 1), but we also observed a shift toward a zero-slant preference when the edges of the stimulus had zero slant (Experiment 2). These observations provide useful insights into how the visual system constructs depth percepts from a multitude of possible depths.
机译:当周期性刺激(例如垂直正弦波光栅)出现在两只眼睛上时,视差估计的初始阶段会在多个深度产生多个解。当正弦波具有相同的空间频率时,解都是平行的。当正弦波的频率完全不同时,它们都会倾斜。尽管有多种解决方案,但人类在每个视觉方向上只能感知一个深度:当频率相同时,一个单一的平行平面;而当频率完全不同时,一系列小的倾斜平面(威尼斯式百叶窗)。这些观点与偏爱使绝对差异或总体倾斜最小化的解决方案相一致。对于偏心率为零的视线,最小视差和最小倾斜的偏好是相同的;当偏心注视中观察到刺激时,我们通过测量威尼斯百叶窗的出现来分离两者的预测。结果通常与零视差偏好(实验1)基本一致,但我们还观察到,当刺激的边缘具有零倾斜度时,实验偏向零倾斜偏好(实验2)。这些观察结果为视觉系统如何从多种可能的深度构建深度感知提供了有用的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号