...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Conflict components of the Stroop effect and their a??controla??
【24h】

Conflict components of the Stroop effect and their a??controla??

机译:Stroop效果的冲突成分及其“控制”?

获取原文
           

摘要

The more frequent the incongruent trials are in an experiment, the smaller the Stroop effect (Logan and Zbrodoff, 1979; Logan, 1980; Tzelgov et al., 1992). This is known as the list-wide proportion congruent effect because the proportions are manipulated at the list level. The list-wide proportion congruent effect is considered to be a marker of control since it demonstrates the modulation of the magnitude of the Stroop effect, and as such, is interpreted in terms of conflict adaptation. According to the conflict-monitoring framework (Botvinick et al., 2001; De Pisapia and Braver, 2006; Braver, 2012), an increased proportion of incongruent trials results in higher conflict at the response level, which triggers the control system. The control process includes two stages: conflict detection and control exertion. Referring to our previous discussion, in order to claim the automatic reading process can be controlled, the TC should be the target of both stages of the control process. However, according to our analysis, this is not the case. In fact, the TC is only a target of the control exertion stage. According to the models within the conflict-monitoring framework, conflict reduction is achieved through adjusting the weights of the two tasks, thereby minimizing the TC. However, the conflict detection stage is centered on response competition, which requires the TC to be amplified by the IC. When there is no IC, that is, no competing color-concept activation by reading, no competing color-response can be activated. Focusing on response competition (and thereby on IC) by Botvinick et al. and later models (De Pisapia and Braver, 2006; Blais et al., 2007; see also Verguts and Notebaert, 2008, for a model integrating cognitive control and reinforcement learning) leads to the conclusion that the detection of conflict, and therefore triggering of the entire control process, requires the IC being present (see Kalanthroff et al., 2013b, for evidence inconsistent with this assumption). There is no “path” in these architectures allowing TC to be monitored without the presence of the IC (Figure ​(Figure1).1). That is, the theory behind these architectures in their current state does not allow an unequivocal claim that reading, as an automatic process, can be controlled.
机译:实验中不一致的试验越频繁,Stroop效应就越小(Logan和Zbrodoff,1979; Logan,1980; Tzelgov等,1992)。这被称为列表范围内的比例一致效果,因为比例是在列表级别上操纵的。列表范围内的全等效果被认为是控制的标志,因为它证明了Stroop效果的大小调制,因此,它是根据冲突适应性来解释的。根据冲突监控框架(Botvinick等,2001; De Pisapia和Braver,2006; Braver,2012),不一致试验的比例增加导致响应级别的冲突增加,从而触发了控制系统。控制过程包括两个阶段:冲突检测和控制作用。参考前面的讨论,为了声称可以控制自动阅读过程,TC应该是控制过程两个阶段的目标。但是,根据我们的分析,情况并非如此。实际上,TC只是控制作用阶段的目标。根据冲突监控框架中的模型,通过调整两个任务的权重来减少冲突,从而最大程度地减少了TC。但是,冲突检测阶段以响应竞争为中心,这要求TC由IC放大。当没有IC时,即没有通过读取激活竞争的颜色概念,则无法激活竞争的颜色响应。 Botvinick等人专注于响应竞争(从而关注IC)。后来的模型(De Pisapia和Braver,2006; Blais等,2007;另请参见Verguts和Notebaert,2008,针对整合认知控制和强化学习的模型)得出的结论是,发现冲突,从而触发冲突在整个控制过程中,都需要有IC(请参见Kalanthroff等人,2013b,以获取与该假设不一致的证据)。这些架构中没有``路径'',可以在没有IC的情况下监控TC(图(图1).1)。也就是说,这些体系结构在其当前状态下的理论不允许明确宣称可以控制作为自动过程的读取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号