首页> 外文期刊>E3S Web of Conferences >Comparing construction technologies of single family housing with regard of minimizing embodied energy and embodied carbon
【24h】

Comparing construction technologies of single family housing with regard of minimizing embodied energy and embodied carbon

机译:比较单户住宅的建筑技术,以尽量减少体现的能源和体现的碳

获取原文
           

摘要

This article concerns the Life Cycle Assessment method of evaluation and the ways in which it can be applied as a tool facilitating the design of buildings to reduce embodied energy and embodied carbon. Three variants of a building were examined with the same functional ground plan and usable floor area of 142.6 m~(2). Each variant of the building was designed using different construction technologies: bricklaying technology utilizing autoclaved aerated concrete popular in Poland, wooden frame insulated with mineral wool, and the Straw-bale technology. Using digital models (Building Information Model) the building’s energy characteristics was simulated and the embodied energy and embodied carbon of the production stage (also called cradle-to-gate) were calculated. The performed calculations were used to compare the cumulative energy and embodied carbon of each variant for a 40 year long life cycle.
机译:本文涉及评估的生命周期评估方法,以及将其用作促进建筑物设计以减少包含的能量和包含的碳的工具的方法。以相同的功能平面图和142.6 m〜(2)的可用建筑面积研究了建筑物的三个变体。该建筑的每种变体均采用不同的建筑技术进行设计:利用在波兰流行的高压灭菌加气混凝土进行砌砖技术,用矿棉进行绝缘的木制框架以及草捆技术。使用数字模型(建筑物信息模型)来模拟建筑物的能源特性,并计算生产阶段的内含能量和内含碳(也称为从摇篮到大门)。所执行的计算用于比较每个变体在40年寿命周期内的累积能量和内含碳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号