...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >A Pilot Observational Study to Determine the Prevalence of Usual-Corrected Binocular Distance Visual Acuity Among Illinois Lifeguards
【24h】

A Pilot Observational Study to Determine the Prevalence of Usual-Corrected Binocular Distance Visual Acuity Among Illinois Lifeguards

机译:确定伊利诺伊州救生员通常矫正的双眼距离视力患病率的初步观察性研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: : Illinois lifeguards do not have a required minimal visual acuity for certification. Various agencies have attempted to define the visual acuity requirements needed for effective lifeguarding; some have advocated a 20/30 threshold similar to police, fire, and other rescue professions, while others have advocated a 20/20 threshold. Prior to setting a lifeguard certification visual acuity threshold in Illinois, it is desirable to predict the impact of implementing a new visual acuity exclusionary criterion. To our knowledge, no epidemiological studies have been published to describe the distribution of visual acuity in lifeguards. The purpose of this pilot observational study was to determine the prevalence of usual-corrected distance binocular visual acuity among Illinois lifeguards. Methods: : The GuardVision Vision Test was administered to 4,509 Illinois lifeguards (ages 15-22 years). This LogMAR-based distance visual acuity test assesses the lifeguarda??s usual-corrected binocular visual acuity at ten-feet. Subjects received credit for the last full acuity line they read correctly. The number of subjects passing the screening with visual acuity thresholds of 20/30 and 20/20 was analyzed. Results: : At a 20/30 visual acuity threshold, 4,368 lifeguards passed the vision screening while 141 (3.1%) would have been restricted from duty. At a 20/20 visual acuity threshold, 1,786 lifeguards passed the vision screening while 2,723 (60.4%) would have been restricted from duty. In this cohort, a 20/20 visual acuity threshold would restrict more than 18 times the number of lifeguards from duty than a 20/30 visual acuity threshold. Conclusions: : A usual-corrected binocular distance visual acuity threshold of 20/20 would restrict a larger number of Illinois lifeguards from duty than a visual acuity threshold of 20/30. The closest published cohort comparison shows that 4.1% of adults in the United States have usual-corrected binocular distance visual acuities of 20/50 or worse. The 3.1% of lifeguards in Illinois with usual-corrected binocular distance visual acuities of 20/30 or worse in this study indicates that Illinois lifeguards tend to have better usual-corrected binocular distance visual acuities than the average adult. This study does not address the impact of VA on lifeguard performance.
机译:目的:伊利诺伊州的救生员没有最低的视敏度来进行认证。各种机构试图定义有效救生所需的视敏度要求;有些人主张与警察,消防和其他救援专业相似的20/30门槛,而另一些人主张20/20的门槛。在设置伊利诺伊州的救生员认证视敏度阈值之前,需要预测实施新的视敏度排除标准的影响。据我们所知,尚未发表流行病学研究描述救生员视敏度的分布。这项初步观察性研究的目的是确定伊利诺伊州救生员中通常校正后的远距离双眼视力的患病率。方法::对4,509名伊利诺伊州救生员(年龄15-22岁)进行了GuardVision视觉测试。这种基于LogMAR的远距离视力测试可评估救生员通常校正的双脚双眼视力(十英尺)。受试者因他们正确阅读的最后一个完整的敏锐度线而获得积分。分析通过视力阈值为20/30和20/20的筛查的受试者人数。结果:在视力阈值为20/30时,有4,368名救生员通过了视力筛查,而其中有141名(3.1%)被限制执勤。在20/20视敏度阈值下,有1,786名救生员通过了视力筛查,而2,723(60.4%)人将被限制执勤。在该队列中,视力阈值20/20将限制救生员上班的人数是视力阈值20/30的18倍以上。结论:与20/30的视力阈值相比,通常校正的双眼距离视力阈值20/20将限制更多的伊利诺伊州救生员上班。最近发表的队列比较显示,在美国,有4.1%的成年人通常校正后的双眼距离视力为20/50或更差。在本研究中,伊利诺伊州3.1%的救生员通常矫正后的双眼距离视力为20/30或更差,这表明伊利诺伊州的救生员通常比普通成年人有更好的常规矫正后的双眼视力。这项研究没有解决VA对救生员绩效的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号