首页> 外文期刊>Infection and immunity >Differential Early Interactions betweenSalmonella enterica Serovar Typhi and Two Other PathogenicSalmonella Serovars with Intestinal Epithelial Cells
【24h】

Differential Early Interactions betweenSalmonella enterica Serovar Typhi and Two Other PathogenicSalmonella Serovars with Intestinal Epithelial Cells

机译:肠沙门氏菌血清型鼠伤寒沙门氏菌与另外两种致病性沙门氏菌血清与肠上皮细胞之间的差异性早期相互作用。

获取原文
           

摘要

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (hereafter referred to as S. typhi) is a host-restricted pathogen that adheres to and invades the distal ileum and subsequently disseminates to cause typhoid fever in humans. However, S. typhi appears to be avirulent in small animals. In contrast, other pathogenic salmonellae, such as S. enterica serovars Typhimurium and Dublin (S. typhimurium and S. dublin, respectively), typically cause localized gastroenteritis in humans but have been used as models for typhoid fever because these organisms cause a disease in susceptible rodents that resembles human typhoid. In vivo, S. typhi has been demonstrated to attach to and invade murine M cells but is rapidly cleared from the Peyer’s patches without destruction of the M cells. In contrast, invasion of M cells byS. typhimurium is accompanied by destruction of these M cells and subsequently sloughing of the epithelium. These data have furthered our view that the early steps in the pathogenesis of typhoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella serovars are distinct. To extend this concept, we have utilized an in vitro model to evaluate three parameters of initial host-pathogen interactions: adherence of three Salmonella serovars to human and murine small intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) lines, the capacity of these salmonellae to invade IECs, and the ability of the bacteria to induce interleukin-6 (IL-6) in these cell lines as a measure of host cell activation and the host acute-phase response. The results demonstrate that S. typhi adheres to and invades human small IECs better than either S. typhimurium or S. dublin. Interestingly, invA and invE null mutants ofS. typhi are able neither to adhere to nor to invade IECs, unlike S. typhimurium invA and invE mutants, which adhere to but cannot invade IECs. S. typhi also induces significantly greater quantities of IL-6 in human small IEC lines than either of the other two Salmonella serovars. These findings suggest that differential host cytokine responses to bacterial pathogens may play an important role in the pathological sequelae that follow infection. Importantly, S. typhimuriumdid not induce IL-6 in murine IECs. Since S. typhimuriuminfection in mice is often used as a model of typhoid fever, these findings suggest that, at least in this case, the mouse model does not reflect the human disease. Taken together, our studies indicate that (i) marked differences occur in the initial steps of S. typhi, S. typhimurium, and S. dublinpathogenesis, and (ii) conclusions about S. typhipathogenesis that have been drawn from the mouse model of typhoid fever should be interpreted conservatively.
机译:沙门氏菌血清型伤寒(以下简称​​ S。typhi )是一种宿主限制性病原体,会粘附并侵袭回肠远端,随后传播并引起人类伤寒。 。但是, S。斑疹病毒在小动物中似乎无毒。相反,其他致病性沙门氏菌,例如 S。肠炎伤寒和都柏林(分别是鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和都柏林毒株)通常会引起人体局部胃肠炎,但已被用作伤寒模型因为这些生物在易感啮齿动物中引起类似于人类伤寒的疾病。在体内, S。斑疹伤寒已被证明能附着并侵袭鼠类M细胞,但可以迅速从Peyer斑块清除,而不会破坏M细胞。相反, S对M细胞的侵袭。鼠伤寒伴随着这些M细胞的破坏和随后的上皮脱落。这些数据进一步使我们认为,伤寒和非伤寒性 Salmonella 血清型的发病机理是不同的。为了扩展这个概念,我们利用了一个体外模型来评估初始宿主-病原体相互作用的三个参数:三个沙门氏菌血清对人和鼠小肠上皮细胞(IEC)系的粘附,能力这些沙门氏菌入侵IECs的能力,以及细菌诱导这些细胞系中白介素6(IL-6)的能力,以此作为宿主细胞活化和宿主急性期反应的量度。结果表明, S。伤寒 S更好地遵守和入侵人类小型IEC。鼠伤寒 S。都柏林。有趣的是, S的 invA invE 空突变体。与 S不同,Typhi 既不能遵守也不能入侵IEC。鼠伤寒菌invA invE 突变体,它们符合但不能入侵IEC。 S。伤寒沙门氏菌还比其他两个沙门氏菌血清型诱导人小IEC株中的IL-6含量高得多。这些发现表明,宿主对细菌病原体的细胞因子应答可能在感染后的病理后遗症中起重要作用。重要的是, S。鼠伤寒沙门氏菌在鼠类IEC中不诱导IL-6。自 S。小鼠鼠伤寒感染常被用作伤寒模型,这些发现表明,至少在这种情况下,小鼠模型不能反映人类疾病。综合来看,我们的研究表明(i)在 S的初始步骤中出现了明显的差异。伤寒 S。鼠伤寒 S。都柏林的发病机理,以及(ii)关于 S的结论。从伤寒小鼠模型中提取的伤寒发病应保守地解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号