首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Science and Technology >Polemic in Russian Pro-Revolution Historiography about the Future of the Kazakh Court of BIYS (The Latter Half of the 19th Century)
【24h】

Polemic in Russian Pro-Revolution Historiography about the Future of the Kazakh Court of BIYS (The Latter Half of the 19th Century)

机译:俄罗斯亲革命史学中有关BOYS哈萨克法院未来的辩论(19世纪后半期)

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: The paper deals with the polemic over the Court of Biys in the Russian Czarist-Era historiography, which did not lose its importance in the Kazakh society during the political and administrative reforms of the Russian Empire held in the 19th century, and kept on playing the role of the regulator of the social and economic life of the nomadic communes. Methods/Statistical Analysis: Scientific objectivity suggests drawing the conclusions on the basis of the analysis of all the sources and adherence to the precise research methodology, based, in this paper, on the dialectical theory of cognition as well as general research techniques of historical phenomena in their development and interdependence. This paper is based on the general scientific principle – the objectivity requiring consideration of all the sides of the research subject regardless of the ethnocultural preferences and the political favors of the historiographer. This principle rests upon the necessity of precise comparison of historical facts and phenomena in their integrity, i.e. the necessity of in-depth study of the problem. In its turn it allowed the authors to avoid biased attitude towards the sources in the process of their interpretation and to draw right conclusion regarding this problem. Findings: Thus, in the Russian Czarist-Era historiography, there were two approaches to the issue on the legal reformation of the Kazakh society. In the works of the adherers of conservative direction Biys, despite their “lack of the skills of government control” were recommended as the officials of the lower apparatus of regional administration on the protective and educating principle, which can be expressed by the formula – “why one should create something brand ‘new’, if they can temporarily use ‘old’”. Particularly, the representatives of this group saw the empire, first of all, as a political and cultural entity, promoting civilization and equal rights to the backward folks of the outskirts. Applications/Improvements: The beginning of the First World War brought new ‘troubles’ to the Empire, so, all the issues regarding the reformation of the outskirts were put on the back burner. The Court of Biys, despite all the arguments and the measures of the adherers of the unified court, remained valid, alongside with the imperial judicial practice, generally meeting all the demands of the local socio-regulatory environment.
机译:目标:本文涉及俄国沙皇时代史上对比伊斯法院的争论,在19世纪俄罗斯帝国进行政治和行政改革期间,它在哈萨克社会中并未失去其重要性,并且一直保持下去扮演游牧民族社会和经济生活调节者的角色。方法/统计分析:科学客观性建议在对所有资料进行分析并遵循精确研究方法的基础上得出结论,在此基础上,本文基于认知的辩证理论和历史现象的一般研究技术在他们的发展和相互依存中。本文基于一般的科学原理-客观性要求考虑研究对象的方方面面,而不论种族文化偏好和史学家的政治偏爱如何。这一原则取决于对历史事实和现象的完整性进行精确比较的必要性,即对问题进行深入研究的必要性。反过来,它也使作者在解释过程中避免对资料来源产生偏见,并就此问题得出正确的结论。调查结果:因此,在俄罗斯沙皇时代的史学中,有两种方法来解决哈萨克社会的法律改革问题。在保守派领导者Biys的作品中,尽管他们“缺乏政府控制技能”,但还是被推荐为保护和教育原则下的地区行政管理机构的官员,可以通过以下公式表示:如果他们可以暂时使用“旧”,为什么还要创建“新”品牌呢?”。特别是,该小组的代表首先将帝国视为政治和文化实体,以促进文明和郊区落后群体的平等权利。应用/改进:第一次世界大战的开始为帝国带来了新的“麻烦”,因此,有关郊区改革的所有问题都被搁置一旁。尽管统一法院的拥护者采取了各种论点和采取了各种措施,但比耶斯法院仍然有效,并且伴随着帝国司法实践的发展,通常可以满足当地社会监管环境的所有要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号