首页> 外文期刊>Astronomy and astrophysics >Pebbles versus planetesimals: the case of Trappist-1
【24h】

Pebbles versus planetesimals: the case of Trappist-1

机译:小卵石与小行星:Trappist-1的案例

获取原文
       

摘要

We present a study into the formation of planetary systems around low mass stars similar to Trappist-1, through the accretion of either planetesimals or pebbles. The aim is to determine if the currently observed systems around low mass stars could favour one scenario over the other. To determine these differences, we ran numerous N-body simulations, coupled to a thermally evolving viscous 1D disc model, and including prescriptions for planet migration, photoevaporation, and pebble and planetesimal dynamics. We mainly examine the differences between the pebble and planetesimal accretion scenarios, but we also look at the influences of disc mass, size of planetesimals, and the percentage of solids locked up within pebbles. When comparing the resulting planetary systems to Trappist-1, we find that a wide range of initial conditions for both the pebble and planetesimal accretion scenarios can form planetary systems similar to Trappist-1, in terms of planet mass, periods, and resonant configurations. Typically these planets formed exterior to the water iceline and migrated in resonant convoys into the inner region close to the central star. When comparing the planetary systems formed through pebble accretion to those formed through planetesimal accretion, we find a large number of similarities, including average planet masses, eccentricities, inclinations, and period ratios. One major difference between the two scenarios was that of the water content of the planets. When including the effects of ablation and full recycling of the planets’ envelope with the disc, the planets formed through pebble accretion were extremely dry, whilst those formed through planetesimal accretion were extremely wet. If the water content is not fully recycled and instead falls to the planets’ core, or if ablation of the water is neglected, then the planets formed through pebble accretion are extremely wet, similar to those formed through planetesimal accretion. Should the water content of the Trappist-1 planets be determined accurately, this could point to a preferred formation pathway for planetary systems, or to specific physics that may be at play.
机译:我们将通过小行星或小卵石的积聚,对类似于Trappist-1的低质量恒星周围行星系统的形成进行研究。目的是确定当前观察到的围绕低质量恒星的系统是否会偏爱一种情况。为了确定这些差异,我们进行了许多N体模拟,并结合了热演化的一维圆盘模型,并包括了有关行星迁移,光蒸发以及卵石和小行星动力学的规定。我们主要研究卵石与小行星积聚方案之间的差异,但同时也研究圆盘质量,小行星的尺寸以及固定在卵石中的固体百分比的影响。当将产生的行星系统与Trappist-1进行比较时,我们发现卵石和小行星积聚场景的各种初始条件在行星质量,周期和共振配置方面都可以形成类似于Trappist-1的行星系统。通常,这些行星形成在水冰线的外部,并在共振的车队中迁移到靠近中心恒星的内部区域。当比较通过卵石积聚形成的行星系统与通过小行星积聚形成的行星系统时,我们发现了很多相似之处,包括平均行星质量,偏心率,倾角和周期比。两种情况之间的主要区别在于行星的水分含量。包括烧蚀和圆盘对圆盘的外壳完全回收的影响时,通过卵石积聚形成的行星非常干燥,而通过行星状积聚形成的行星非常潮湿。如果水分没有被完全回收,而是落到了行星的核心,或者如果忽略了水的消融,那么通过卵石积聚形成的行星将非常潮湿,类似于通过行星状积聚形成的行星。如果应该准确确定Trappist-1行星的含水量,这可能指向行星系统的首选形成路径,或者可能正在发挥作用的特定物理学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号