...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment
【24h】

Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment

机译:新一代手机对重症监护医疗设备的干扰

获取原文

摘要

IntroductionThe aim of the study was to assess and classify incidents of electromagnetic interference (EMI) by second-generation and third-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment.MethodsEMI was assessed with two General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) signals (900 MHz, 2 W, two different time-slot occupations) and one Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) signal (1,947.2 MHz, 0.2 W), corresponding to maximal transmit performance of mobile phones in daily practice, generated under controlled conditions in the proximity of 61 medical devices. Incidents of EMI were classified in accordance with an adjusted critical care event scale.ResultsA total of 61 medical devices in 17 categories (27 different manufacturers) were tested and demonstrated 48 incidents in 26 devices (43%); 16 (33%) were classified as hazardous, 20 (42%) as significant and 12 (25%) as light. The GPRS-1 signal induced the most EMI incidents (41%), the GRPS-2 signal induced fewer (25%) and the UMTS signal induced the least (13%; P < 0.001). The median distance between antenna and medical device for EMI incidents was 3 cm (range 0.1 to 500 cm). One hazardous incident occurred beyond 100 cm (in a ventilator with GRPS-1 signal at 300 cm).ConclusionCritical care equipment is vulnerable to EMI by new-generation wireless telecommunication technologies with median distances of about 3 cm. The policy to keep mobile phones '1 meter' from the critical care bedside in combination with easily accessed areas of unrestricted use still seems warranted.
机译:简介本研究的目的是通过重症监护医疗设备上的第二代和第三代移动电话对电磁干扰(EMI)事件进行评估和分类。方法使用两个通用分组无线业务(GPRS)信号(900 MHz, 2 W,两个不同的时隙占用时间)和一个通用移动电信系统(UMTS)信号(1,947.2 MHz,0.2 W),对应于在61种医疗条件下在受控条件下在日常实践中移动电话的最大传输性能设备。根据调整后的重症监护事件规模对EMI事件进行分类。结果共测试了17个类别(27个不同制造商)中的61个医疗设备,并证明了26个设备中的48个事件(43%)。 16个(33%)被分类为危险品,20(42%)被分类为危险品,12(25%)被分类为轻度。 GPRS-1信号引起的电磁干扰事件最多(41%),GRPS-2信号引起的电磁干扰较少(25%),而UMTS信号引起的电磁干扰最少(13%; P <0.001)。天线和医疗设备之间发生EMI事故的中位距离为3厘米(范围为0.1到500厘米)。超过100 cm处发生了一次危险事件(在300 cm处有GRPS-1信号的通风机中)。结论重症监护设备很容易受到中距离距离约为3 cm的新一代无线通信技术的EMI影响。似乎仍然有必要保证将手机保持在距重症监护病床仅1米的位置,并结合易于使用且不受限制的使用区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号