...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Impedance cardiography (electrical velocimetry) and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in pediatric intensive care patients: a prospective single-center observational study
【24h】

Impedance cardiography (electrical velocimetry) and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in pediatric intensive care patients: a prospective single-center observational study

机译:阻抗心动图(电测速)和经胸超声心动图监测儿科重症监护患者的无创心输出量:一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionElectrical velocimetry (EV) is a type of impedance cardiography, and is a non-invasive and continuously applicable method of cardiac output monitoring. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is non-invasive but discontinuous.MethodsWe compared EV with TTE in pediatric intensive care patients in a prospective single-center observational study. Simultaneous, coupled, left ventricular stroke volume measurements were performed by EV using an Aesculon? monitor and TTE (either via trans-aortic valve flow velocity time integral [EVVTI], or via M-mode [EVMM]). H0: bias was less than 10% and the mean percentage error (MPE) was less than 30% in Bland–Altman analysis between EV and TTE. If appropriate, data were logarithmically transformed prior to Bland–Altman analysis.ResultsA total of 72 patients (age: 2 days to 17 years; weight: 0.8 to 86 kg) were analyzed. Patients were divided into subgroups: organ transplantation (OTX, n =28), sepsis or organ failure (SEPSIS, n =16), neurological patients (NEURO, n =9), and preterm infants (PREM, n =26); Bias/MPE for EVVTI was 7.81%/26.16%. In the EVVTI subgroup analysis for OTX, NEURO, and SEPSIS, bias and MPE were within the limits of H0, whereas the PREM subgroup had a bias/MPE of 39.00%/46.27%. Bias/MPE for EVMM was 8.07%/37.26% where the OTX and NEURO subgroups were within the range of H0, but the PREM and SEPSIS subgroups were outside the range. Mechanical ventilation, non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure ventilation, body weight, and secondary abdominal closure were factors that significantly affected comparison of the methods.ConclusionsThis study shows that EV is comparable with aortic flow-based TTE for pediatric patients.
机译:简介电子测速(EV)是一种阻抗心动图,是一种无创且持续适用的心输出量监测方法。经胸超声心动图(TTE)是非侵入性的但不连续。方法我们在一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究中,将EV与TTE对儿科重症监护患者进行了比较。使用Aesculon®通过EV进行同时,耦合的左心室搏动量的测量。监护仪和TTE(通过主动脉瓣流速时间积分[EVVTI]或M模式[EVMM])。 H0:在EV和TTE之间的Bland–Altman分析中,偏差小于10%,平均百分比误差(MPE)小于30%。如果需要,在进行Bland–Altman分析之前,先对数转换数据。结果共分析了72例患者(年龄:2天至17岁;体重:0.8至86 kg)。患者分为亚组:器官移植(OTX,n = 28),败血症或器官衰竭(SEPSIS,n = 16),神经系统患者(NEURO,n = 9)和早产儿(PREM,n = 26); EVVTI的偏差/ MPE为7.81%/ 26.16%。在OTX,NEURO和SEPSIS的EVVTI子组分析中,偏倚和MPE在H0的范围内,而PREM子组的偏倚/ MPE为39.00%/ 46.27%。 EVMM的偏倚/ MPE为8.07%/ 37.26%,其中OTX和NEURO子组在H0范围内,而PREM和SEPSIS子组在该范围之外。机械通气,无创持续气道正压通气,体重和继发性腹部闭合是影响方法比较的因素。结论本研究表明,对于小儿患者,EV与基于主动脉血的TTE相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号