首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Use of probiotics in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Use of probiotics in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:益生菌在重症急性胰腺炎治疗中的应用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionNecrotic tissue infection can worsen the prognosis of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), and probiotics have been shown to be beneficial in reducing the infection rate in animal experiments and primary clinical trials. However, the results of multicenter randomized clinical trials have been contradictory. Our aim in this study was to systematically review and quantitatively analyze all randomized controlled trials with regard to important outcomes in patients with predicted SAP who received probiotics.MethodsA systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases was conducted using specific search terms. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of probiotic with placebo treatment in patients with predicted SAP. Mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed- and random-effects models. A meta-analysis on the use of probiotics in the treatment of critically ill patients was also performed to serve as a reference.ResultsIn this study, 6 trials comprising an aggregate total of 536 patients were analyzed. Significant heterogeneities were observed in the type, dose, treatment duration and clinical effects of probiotics in these trials. Systematic analysis showed that probiotics did not significantly affect the pancreatic infection rate (RR?=?1.19, 95% CI?=?0.74 to 1.93; P?=?0.47), total infections (RR?=?1.09, 95% CI?=?0.80 to 1.48; P?=?0.57), operation rate (RR?=?1.42, 95% CI?=?0.43 to 3.47; P?=?0.71), length of hospital stay (MD?=?2.45, 95% CI?=??2.71 to 7.60; P?=?0.35) or mortality (RR?=?0.72, 95% CI?=?0.42 to 1.45; P?=?0.25).ConclusionsProbiotics showed neither beneficial nor adverse effects on the clinical outcomes of patients with predicted SAP. However, significant heterogeneity was noted between the trials reviewed with regard to the type, dose and treatment duration of probiotics, which may have contributed to the heterogeneity of the clinical outcomes. The current data are not sufficient to draw a conclusion regarding the effects of probiotics on patients with predicted SAP. Carefully designed clinical trials are needed to validate the effects of particular probiotics given at specific dosages and for specific treatment durations.
机译:简介坏死组织感染可能会使严重急性胰腺炎(SAP)的预后恶化,并且益生菌在动物实验和主要临床试验中已显示出有利于降低感染率的作用。但是,多中心随机临床试验的结果相互矛盾。我们在这项研究中的目的是系统地回顾和定量分析所有接受益生菌的SAP预期患者的重要结局的随机对照试验。方法使用特定的搜索词对PubMed,Embase和Cochrane Library数据库进行系统的文献检索。符合条件的研究是随机对照试验,比较了益生菌与安慰剂治疗对预测SAP患者的作用。使用Mantel-Haenszel固定效应和随机效应模型计算平均差异(MD),风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。还对使用益生菌治疗重症患者进行了荟萃分析,以作为参考。结果本研究分析了6个试验,总共536名患者。在这些试验中,在益生菌的类型,剂量,治疗持续时间和临床效果方面观察到明显的异质性。系统分析表明,益生菌对胰腺感染率没有显着影响(RR≥1.19,95%CI≤0.74至1.93;P≥0.47),总感染率(RR≥1.09,95%CI)。 =?0.80至1.48; P?=?0.57),手术率(RR?=?1.42,95%CI?=?0.43至3.47; P?=?0.71),住院时间(MD?=?2.45, 95%CI?=?2.71至7.60; P?=?0.35)或死亡率(RR?=?0.72,95%CI?=?0.42至1.45; P?=?0.25)。 SAP预测患者的临床结局。然而,在所审查的试验之间,关于益生菌的类型,剂量和治疗持续时间存在明显的异质性,这可能导致了临床结果的异质性。目前的数据不足以得出有关益生菌对预测SAP患者的影响的结论。需要精心设计的临床试验来验证以特定剂量和特定治疗持续时间给予的特定益生菌的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号