首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >What do we know about medication errors made via a CPOE system versus those made via handwritten orders?
【24h】

What do we know about medication errors made via a CPOE system versus those made via handwritten orders?

机译:我们对通过CPOE系统进行的用药错误与通过手写命令进行的用药错误了解什么?

获取原文
           

摘要

This commentary on the article by Shulman et al. examines what we understand by 'medication errors', what we mean by 'computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems', how we measure errors, and what types of errors we are 'reducing' with CPOE systems. As the research of Shulman and colleagues highlights, much of the existing research on CPOE systems does not differentiate among: types of medication errors; consequential versus inconsequential medication errors; CPOE systems that include/exclude formal decision support packages; and the extent to which decision support information is implicitly presented to physicians via the CPOE system, for example, pull down menus with dosages. I discuss these issues and their implications for the evaluation of CPOE systems and of other emerging healthcare technologies.
机译:Shulman等人对此文章的评论。考察了我们对“用药错误”的理解,“计算机医师指令输入(CPOE)系统”的含义,我们如何测量错误以及使用CPOE系统“减少”的错误类型。正如Shulman及其同事的研究所强调的那样,许多有关CPOE系统的现有研究并没有区分:结果性或非结果性用药错误;包括/不包括正式决策支持包的CPOE系统;以及通过CPOE系统向医师隐式呈现决策支持信息的程度,例如,下拉菜单显示剂量。我将讨论这些问题及其对CPOE系统和其他新兴医疗技术评估的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号