...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Toward a Checklist for Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy of Medical Tests
【24h】

Toward a Checklist for Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy of Medical Tests

机译:制定一份报告以报告医学检验诊断准确性的研究

获取原文

摘要

Background: “Diagnostic accuracy” refers to the ability of medical tests to provide accurate information about diagnosis, prognosis, risk of disease, and other clinical issues. Published reports on diagnostic accuracy of medical tests frequently fail to adhere to minimal clinical epidemiological standards, and such failures lead to overly optimistic assessments of evaluated tests. Our aim was to enumerate key items for inclusion in published reports on diagnostic accuracy, with a related aim of making the reports more useful for systematic reviews.Methods: We examined published reports on shortcomings of studies of diagnostic accuracy. We prepared an initial draft of a checklist to address common errors and presented it at a meeting of editors. After incorporation of comments from editors, we published a revised version in Clinical Chemistry in 1997 for comment from readers. One of us (E.M.) additionally circulated copies of the draft to methodologists and others interested in Evidence-Based Medicine. We updated the checklist with input from these sources.Results: The updated document lists items for inclusion in the title, abstract, methods, results, and discussion sections of published papers. Depending on the nature of the study, the total number of items for a single paper is ~40. We invite comments on this document, which is freely available at Clinical Chemistry Online , where it can accessed readily from the Table of Contents for the July 2000 issue at www.clinchem.org/content/vol46/issue7/. Comments (eLetters) can be posted there for general reading.Conclusions: The suggested revisions incorporated in this report appear useful to ensure inclusion of additional information that can allow assessment of the validity of the conclusions and the applicability of the study in other settings. The list can be useful in formulating guidelines and a checklist, which will require testing by authors and study of their effect on published studies of diagnostic accuracy.
机译:背景:“诊断准确性”是指医学检验能够提供有关诊断,预后,疾病风险和其他临床问题的准确信息的能力。已发表的有关医学检测诊断准确性的报告经常未能遵守最低限度的临床流行病学标准,并且此类失败会导致对所评估的检测方法过于乐观。我们的目的是枚举要包含在已发表的诊断准确性报告中的关键项目,其相关目的是使报告对系统评价更加有用。方法:我们研究了已发表的报告,这些报告对诊断准确性进行了研究。我们准备了一份清单清单的初稿以解决常见错误,并将其提交给编辑会议。纳入编辑意见后,我们于1997年在《临床化学》中发布了修订版,以征询读者的意见。我们中的一位(E.M.)还将该草稿的副本分发给了方法学家和其他对循证医学感兴趣的人。结果:更新的文档列出了要包含在已发表论文的标题,摘要,方法,结果和讨论部分中的项目。根据研究的性质,一张论文的总项目数约为40。我们邀请对此文档发表评论,该文档可从Clinical Chemistry Online免费获得,可以从2000年7月发行的目录中的www.clinchem.org/content/vol46/issue7/上方便地访问。结论:纳入本报告的建议修订版似乎对确保包含其他信息可以帮助评估结论的有效性以及该研究在其他环境中的适用性很有帮助。该列表可用于制定指南和清单,这将需要作者进行测试并研究其对已发表的诊断准确性研究的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号