首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Drug Testing in Blood: Validated Negative-Ion Chemical Ionization Gas Chromatographic–Mass Spectrometric Assay for Enantioselective Measurement of the Designer Drugs MDEA, MDMA, and MDA and Its Application to Samples from a Controlled Study with MDMA
【24h】

Drug Testing in Blood: Validated Negative-Ion Chemical Ionization Gas Chromatographic–Mass Spectrometric Assay for Enantioselective Measurement of the Designer Drugs MDEA, MDMA, and MDA and Its Application to Samples from a Controlled Study with MDMA

机译:血液中的药物测试:用于设计药物MDEA,MDMA和MDA的对映选择性测定的已验证的负离子化学电离气相色谱-质谱法及其在MDMA对照研究中的样品中的应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The enantiomers of the designer drugs 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) differ in their pharmacologic and toxicologic potency. The aim of this study was to develop an assay for measuring these enantiomers in small plasma volumes and to analyze samples from a controlled study with MDMA.Methods: The analytes were extracted from ≤0.2 mL of plasma by mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. After derivatization with S -(?)-heptafluorobutyrylprolyl chloride, the resulting diastereomers were separated by gas chromatography (HP-5MS) within 17 min and detected by mass spectrometry in the negative-ion chemical ionization mode. The method was fully validated and applied to samples from a controlled study in which a single dose of racemic MDMA (75 mg) was administered.Results: The derivatized enantiomers were well separated and detected with good sensitivity. The assay was linear (per enantiomer) at 1–50 μg/L for MDA and 5–250 μg/L for MDMA and MDEA. Analytical recovery, accuracy, repeatability, and intermediate precision data were within required limits. Extraction yields were 82.1%–95.3%. In the study samples, concentrations of R -(?)-MDMA significantly exceeded those of S -(+)-MDMA. Their ratios ( R vs S ) were always 1.0 and increased over time. Concentrations of S -(+)-MDA exceeded those of R -(?)-MDA, their ratios ( R vs S ) also increasing over time but remaining 1.0.Conclusions: This assay enables sensitive, reliable, and fast enantioselective measurement of MDA, MDMA, and MDEA in small volumes of plasma. The controlled study data confirm previous findings of MDMA and MDA enantiomer ratios ( R vs S ) increasing over time after ingestion of racemic MDMA.
机译:背景:设计药物3,4-亚甲二氧基苯丙胺(MDA),3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)和3,4-亚甲二氧基乙基苯丙胺(MDEA)的对映异构体在药理和毒理学方面的效力不同。这项研究的目的是开发一种测定小血浆中这些对映异构体的分析方法,并通过MDMA分析来自对照研究的样品。方法:采用混合模式固相萃取从≤0.2mL血浆中提取分析物。用S-(α)-七氟丁酰氯丙基衍生化后,在17分钟内通过气相色谱法(HP-5MS)分离得到的非对映异构体,并通过质谱在负离子化学电离模式下进行检测。该方法已得到充分验证,可用于对照研究中的样品,该研究中已施用单剂量外消旋MDMA(75 mg)。结果:衍生化的对映异构体得到了很好的分离,并具有良好的灵敏度。该测定呈线性(每个对映体),MDA为1–50μg/ L,MDMA和MDEA为5–250μg/ L。分析回收率,准确性,可重复性和中等精度数据均在要求的范围内。提取产率为82.1%–95.3%。在研究样品中,R-(α)-MDMA的浓度大大超过了S-(+)-MDMA的浓度。它们的比率(R vs S)始终> 1.0,并随时间增加。 S-(+)-MDA的浓度超过R-(α)-MDA的浓度,它们的比率(R vs S)随时间增加,但保持<1.0。结论:该测定法能够对灵敏,可靠和快速的对映体进行测量少量血浆中的MDA,MDMA和MDEA。对照研究数据证实,摄入消旋MDMA后,MDMA和MDA对映异构体比例(R对S)的先前发现随时间增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号