...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Analytical goal-setting for monitoring patients when two analytical methods are used.
【24h】

Analytical goal-setting for monitoring patients when two analytical methods are used.

机译:当使用两种分析方法时,用于监测患者的分析目标设定。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Serial results from an individual are often obtained using more than one method. Results should be transferable over time and locale. Every method has inherent analytical error, and goals are required to delineate the maximum allowable random (imprecision) and systematic (inaccuracy, bias) errors to facilitate optimal patient care. Based on Harris's proposal [Am J Clin Pathol 1979;72:374-82] that desirable imprecision should be less than or equal to one-half the within-subject biological variation, if the methods have negligible imprecision, then the maximum allowable bias between two methods used for monitoring is one-third of the within-subject biological variation. A more general model has been developed that relates the analytical imprecisions of two methods, and the bias between them, to biological variation. Applying the general formula derived in specific clinical monitoring situations in which a known change in serial results (occurring at a stated probability) stimulates clinical action allows goals for the imprecisions of the two methods and allows the difference in bias between them to be determined quantitatively.
机译:来自个人的连续结果通常使用一种以上的方法获得。结果应随时间和地区进行转移。每种方法都有固有的分析误差,并且需要目标来描述最大允许的随机误差(不精确度)和系统误差(不准确度,偏差),以促进最佳的患者护理。根据哈里斯的建议[Am J Clin Pathol 1979; 72:374-82],理想的不精确度应小于或等于受试者内生物学差异的一半,如果方法的不精确度可以忽略不计,则最大允许偏差为两种用于监测的方法是受试者内部生物变异的三分之一。已经开发出了更通用的模型,该模型将两种方法的分析误差以及它们之间的偏差与生物学变异联系起来。在特定的临床监测情况下应用通用公式,在该情况下,一系列结果的已知变化(以指定的概率发生)会刺激临床行为,从而可以实现两种方法的精确度目标,并可以定量确定两种方法之间的偏差差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号