首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Informed community mobilization for dengue prevention in households with and without a regular water supply: Secondary analysis from the Camino Verde trial in Nicaragua
【24h】

Informed community mobilization for dengue prevention in households with and without a regular water supply: Secondary analysis from the Camino Verde trial in Nicaragua

机译:进行有针对性的社区动员,以在有或没有定期供水的家庭中预防登革热:尼加拉瓜的Camino Verde试验的二级分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Studies in different countries have identified irregular water supply as a risk factor for dengue virus transmission. In 2013, Camino Verde, a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Managua, Nicaragua, and Mexico’s Guerrero State, demonstrated impact of evidence-based community mobilisation on recent dengue infection and entomological indexes of infestation by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. This secondary analysis of data from the trial impact survey asks: (1) what is the importance of regular water supply in neighbourhoods with and without the trial intervention and (2) can community interventions like Camino Verde reasonably exclude households with adequate water supply? Entomological data collected in the dry season of 2013 in intervention and control communities allow contrasts between households with regular and irregular water supplies. Indicators of entomological risk included the House Index and pupa positive household index. Generalised linear mixed models with cluster as a random effect compared households with and without regular water, and households in intervention and control communities. For the House Index, regular water supply was associated with a protection in both intervention households (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.6–0.9) and control households (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.5–0.8). For the pupa positive household index, we found a similar protection from regular water supply in intervention households (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.4–0.8) and control households (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.5–0.9). The Camino Verde intervention had a similar impact on House Index in households with regular water supply (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.5–1.0) and irregular water supply (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.4–0.8); for the pupa positive household index, the effect of the intervention was very similar in households with regular (OR0.5, 95%CI 0.3–0.8) and irregular (OR 0.5, 95%CI 0.3–0.9) water supply. While Aedes aegypti control efforts based on informed community mobilisation had a strong impact on households without a regular water supply, this intervention also impacted entomological indices in households with a regular water supply. These households should not be excluded from community mobilisation efforts to reduce the Aedes aegypti vector. ISRCTN27581154 .
机译:在不同国家进行的研究已将不规则的供水确定为登革热病毒传播的危险因素。 2013年,Camino Verde是一项在马那瓜,尼加拉瓜和墨西哥的格雷罗州进行的集群随机对照试验,证明了循证社区动员对最近的登革热感染和埃及伊蚊的昆虫学指标的影响。对试验影响调查数据的二次分析提出了以下问题:(1)有无试验干预的社区中定期供水的重要性是什么;(2)Camino Verde等社区干预能否合理地排除有充足供水的家庭? 2013年干旱季节在干预和控制社区中收集的昆虫学数据可以对比定期和不定期供水的家庭之间的差异。昆虫学风险指标包括房屋指数和阳性家庭指数。具有簇效应的广义线性混合模型比较了有无常规用水的家庭以及干预和控制社区的家庭。对于房屋指数,干预家庭(OR 0.7,95%CI 0.6-0.9)和对照家庭(OR 0.6,95%CI 0.5-0.8)的定期供水都与保护相关。对于the正家庭指数,我们在干预家庭(OR 0.6,95%CI 0.4-0.8)和对照家庭(OR 0.7,95%CI 0.5-0.9)中发现了对定期供水的类似保护。 Camino Verde干预措施对定期供水(OR 0.7,95%CI 0.5-1.0)和不定期供水(OR 0.6,95%CI 0.4-0.8)的家庭的房屋指数产生了类似的影响;对于the阳性家庭指数,在有定期(OR0.5,95%CI 0.3-0.8)和不定期(OR 0.5,95%CI 0.3-0.9)供水的家庭中,干预措施的效果非常相似。虽然基于知情社区动员的埃及伊蚊控制工作对没有定期供水的家庭产生了很大影响,但这种干预措施也影响了有定期供水的家庭的昆虫学指标。不应将这些家庭排除在社区动员工作之外,以减少埃及伊蚊的传播。 ISRCTN27581154。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号