...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Variability and reliability study of overall physical activity and activity intensity levels using 24?h-accelerometry-assessed data
【24h】

Variability and reliability study of overall physical activity and activity intensity levels using 24?h-accelerometry-assessed data

机译:使用24?h加速度计评估的数据对整体体育活动和活动强度水平进行变异性和可靠性研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

24?h-accelerometry is now used to objectively assess physical activity (PA) in many observational studies like the German National Cohort; however, PA variability, observational time needed to estimate habitual PA, and reliability are unclear. We assessed 24?h-PA of 50 participants using triaxial accelerometers (ActiGraph GT3X+) over 2 weeks. Variability of overall PA and different PA intensities (time in inactivity and in low intensity, moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous PA) between days of assessment or days of the week was quantified using linear mixed-effects and random effects models. We calculated the required number of days to estimate PA, and calculated PA reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients. Between- and within-person variance accounted for 34.4–45.5% and 54.5–65.6%, respectively, of total variance in overall PA and PA intensities over the 2 weeks. Overall PA and times in low intensity, moderate, and vigorous PA decreased slightly over the first 3 days of assessment. Overall PA (p?=?0.03), time in inactivity (p?=?0.003), in low intensity PA (p?=?0.001), in moderate PA (p?=?0.02), and in vigorous PA (p?=?0.04) slightly differed between days of the week, being highest on Wednesday and Friday and lowest on Sunday and Monday, with apparent differences between Saturday and Sunday. In nested random models, the day of the week accounted for
机译:现在,在许多观察性研究(例如德国国家队列)中,使用24小时h加速度计来客观评估身体活动(PA);但是,PA的可变性,估计习惯性PA所需的观察时间以及可靠性尚不清楚。我们在两周内使用三轴加速度计(ActiGraph GT3X +)评估了50位参与者的24 h-PA。使用线性混合效应和随机效应模型量化评估日或一周中各天之间总PA和不同PA强度(不活动和处于低强度,中度,剧烈和非常剧烈的PA的时间)的变化。我们计算了估计PA所需的天数,并使用类内相关系数计算了PA的可靠性。人与人之间的差异分别占两周总PA和PA强度总差异的34.4–45.5%和54.5–65.6%。在评估的前三天内,总体PA和低强度,中度和剧烈PA的时间略有下降。总体PA(p?=?0.03),不活动时间(p?=?0.003),低强度PA(p?=?0.001),中度PA(p?=?0.02)和剧烈PA(p? ?=?0.04)在一周中的各天之间略有不同,在星期三和星期五最高,在星期日和星期一最低,在星期六和星期日之间有明显差异。在嵌套随机模型中,星期几占PA参数总方差的<?19%。平均而言,估计习惯性PA所需的天数约为1周,总体PA为7天,而PA强度为6到9天。每周的可靠性都很好(类内相关系数,范围为0.68–0.82)。使用24?h加速度计评估的个人PA在各天之间变化很大,但是评估日或星期几只能解释这一差异的一小部分。我们的数据表明,需要1周的评估时间才能可靠地估算出习惯性PA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号