...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study
【24h】

Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study

机译:一项针对2012年外展筛查计划的大肠癌筛查粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)试剂盒使用与不使用相关的因素:一项调查研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The one-sample fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is gaining popularity for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening of average-risk people. However, uptake and annual use remain suboptimal. Methods In 2013, we mailed questionnaires to three groups of nonHispanic White, Black, and Latino Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) members ages 52–76 who received FIT kits in 2010–2012: Continuers did the FIT all 3 years; Converts in 2012, but not 2010 or 2011; and Nonusers in none of the 3 years. The questionnaires covered social influences, perceived CRC risk, reasons for using (Continuers, Converts) or avoiding using (Nonusers) the FIT, and recommendations for improving the kit. Results Continuers ( n =?607, response rate 67.5 %), Converts ( n =?317, response rate 35.6 %), and Nonusers ( n =?215, response rate 21.1 %) did not differ in perceived risk or family history of CRC, but Nonusers were less likely than Continuers and Converts to know someone who had polyps or CRC. Continuers, Converts, and Nonusers did not differ in social network encouragement of CRC screening, but did differ in believing that it was very important that they be screened (88.3 %, 68.4 %, 47.7 %) and that their medical team thought it very important that they be screened (88.6 %, 79.9 %, 53.9 %). Approximately half of Continuers and Converts completed the FIT to please their doctor. Converts were less likely than Continuers to use the FIT to “make sure they were OK” (53.7 % vs. 72.6 %) or “protect their health” (46.1 % vs. 76.4 %). Nearly half of Converts completed the FIT out of guilt. Approximately half of FIT kit users suggested adding a disposable glove, extra paper, and wider-mouth tube to the kit. Nonusers’ reasons for not using the FIT included discomfort, disgust, or embarrassment (59.6 %); thinking it unnecessary (32.9 %); fatalism/fear (15.5 %); and thinking it too difficult to use (14.5 %), but Conclusions Nonusers and irregular users of the FIT are less intrinsically motivated to get CRC screening than long-term users and more averse to preparing their stool sample. Changes to the FIT kit to address discomfort and difficulty factors might improve uptake and continued use.
机译:背景技术一种单样本的粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)在针对高危人群的大肠癌(CRC)筛查中越来越受欢迎。但是,摄取量和年度使用量仍然不是最佳选择。方法2013年,我们将问卷调查表邮寄给了三组分别在52-76岁之间,于2010-2012年期间接受FIT套件的非西班牙裔白人,黑人和拉丁美洲人Kaiser Permanente北加利福尼亚(KPNC)成员:连续三年进行FIT;在2012年转换,但在2010年或2011年则转换;以及三年内都未使用过的用户。问卷涵盖了社会影响,CRC风险,使用(续集,转换)或避免使用(非用户)FIT的原因,以及改进套件的建议。结果续传者(n =?607,响应率67.5%),转换(n =?317,响应率35.6%)和非使用者(n =?215,响应率21.1%)的感知风险或家族史无差异CRC,但非使用者比继续者和转换者认识患有息肉或CRC的人少。继任者,转换者和非用户在鼓励CRC筛查的社交网络上并没有不同,但是在认为筛查他们的筛查非常重要(88.3%,68.4%,47.7%)并且他们的医疗团队认为这非常重要方面也存在差异进行筛选(88.6%,79.9%,53.9%)。约有一半的继任者和转换者完成了FIT,以取悦他们的医生。与继续者相比,rs依者不太可能使用FIT来“确保他们还可以”(53.7%对72.6%)或“保护自己的健康”(46.1%对76.4%)。将近一半的Converts出于罪恶感完成了FIT。大约一半的FIT套件用户建议在套件中添加一次性手套,多余的纸张和宽口管。非用户不使用FIT的原因包括不适,厌恶或尴尬(59.6%);认为没有必要(32.9%);宿命论/恐惧(15.5%);并认为使用它太困难了(14.5%),但是结论与长期使用FIT的非使用者和非正规使用者相比,使用FIT的内在动机较少,而长期使用者更不愿使用。为解决不适和困难因素而对FIT套件进行的更改可能会改善摄取和持续使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号