首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Use of ‘eradication’ in HIV cure-related research: a public health debate
【24h】

Use of ‘eradication’ in HIV cure-related research: a public health debate

机译:在与艾滋病毒有关的研究中使用“根除”:一场公共卫生辩论

获取原文
       

摘要

The landscape of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) research has changed drastically over the past three decades. With the remarkable success of antiretroviral treatment (ART) in decreasing AIDS-related mortality, some researchers have shifted their HIV research focus from treatment to cure research. The HIV cure research community often uses the term eradication to describe the science, and talks about eradicating the virus from the body. In public discourse, the term eradication could be conflated with disease eradication at the population level. In this paper, we call for a reframing of HIV cure research as control, as it is a more accurate descriptor and achievable goal in the foreseeable future. The properties of HIV are discordant with eradicability standards at both the individual level (as a clinical concept), and at the population level (as a public health concept). At the individual level, true eradication would necessitate absolute elimination of all latent HIV reservoirs from the body. Current HIV cure-related research strategies have proven unsuccessful at accurately quantifying, let alone eliminating these reservoirs. At the population level, eradication implies the permanent global reduction of HIV to zero new cases and to zero risk for future cases. Given the absence of an efficacious HIV vaccine and the impracticality and unethicality of eliminating animal reservoirs, global eradication of HIV is highly implausible. From a public health perspective, HIV eradication remains an elusive goal. The term ‘eradication’ is a misleading description of current HIV cure-related research. Instead, we call for the use of more realistic expressions such as ‘sustained virologic HIV suppression (or control)’ or ‘management of HIV persistence’ to describe HIV cure-related research. Using these terms reorients what HIV cure science can potentially achieve in the near future and avoids creating unrealistic expectations, particularly among the millions of people globally who live with HIV.
机译:在过去的三十年中,人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)研究的格局发生了巨大变化。随着抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)在降低与艾滋病相关的死亡率方面取得了显著成功,一些研究人员已经将其HIV研究重点从治疗转向治疗研究。 HIV治疗研究界经常使用“消灭”一词来描述科学,并谈论从体内消灭病毒。在公共讨论中,根除一词可以与人口一级的根除疾病混为一谈。在本文中,我们呼吁将艾滋病毒的治疗研究作为对照,因为这是可预见的将来更准确的描述和可实现的目标。 HIV的特性在个人层面(作为临床概念)和在人群层面(作为公共卫生概念)均与可根除性标准不一致。在个人层面上,真正的根除将需要从体内完全消除所有潜在的艾滋病毒储存库。事实证明,当前与HIV治愈相关的研究策略无法准确定量,更不用说消除这些储库了。在人口一级,根除意味着在全球范围内将艾滋病毒永久减少至零新病例,并将未来病例的风险降至零。鉴于缺乏有效的艾滋病毒疫苗以及消除动物水库的不切实际和不道德性,在全球范围内消灭艾滋病毒是极为不切实际的。从公共卫生的角度来看,消灭艾滋病毒仍然是一个遥不可及的目标。 “根除”一词是对当前与HIV治疗有关的研究的误导性描述。取而代之的是,我们呼吁使用更现实的表达方式,例如“持续性病毒学HIV抑制(或控制)”或“ HIV持久性的管理”来描述与HIV治愈相关的研究。使用这些术语可以重新定位HIV治愈科学在不久的将来可能实现的目标,并避免产生不切实际的期望,尤其是在全球数百万感染HIV的人群中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号