首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Equity and efficiency of medical service systems at the provincial level of China’s mainland: a comparative study from 2009 to 2014
【24h】

Equity and efficiency of medical service systems at the provincial level of China’s mainland: a comparative study from 2009 to 2014

机译:2009年至2014年中国大陆省级医疗服务系统的公平性和效率

获取原文
           

摘要

The astonishing economic achievements of China in the past few decades have remarkably increased not only the quantity and quality of medical services but also the inequalities in health resources allocation across regions and inefficiency of the medical service delivery. A descriptive analysis was used to compare the inequities in inputs and outputs of the provincial medical service systems, a non-radial super-efficiency data envelopment analysis model was then used to estimate the efficiency, and a regression analysis of the panel data was used to explore the determinants. The inputs and outputs of most provincial medical service systems increased gradually from 2009 to 2014. Overall, the eastern region allocated more human and capital resources than the other two regions, and produced more than 50% of the total outpatient and emergency room visits, whereas the western region produced more inpatient services (about 30% of the total volume of inpatient services) according to the distribution of the population. The average efficiency scores of the provincial medical systems in China’s mainland were 0.895, 0.927, 0.929, 0.963, 0.977 and 0.968 from 2009 to 2014, with a slight average improvement of 1.60%. The efficiency score of each provincial medical service system varied greatly from one another: Tibet (1.475?±?0.057) performed extremely well, whereas several others including Heilongjiang (0.579?±?0.001) performed poorly. Furthermore, the proportion of high-class medical facilities was negatively associated with efficiency, whereas the proportion of the vulnerable population, the per capita Gross Domestic Product, the proportion of the illiterate population and the improvement of primary health care had positive effects on efficiency. Inequity in health resources allocation and service provision existed across the regions, but not all the gaps have begun to narrow since 2009. The difference of efficiency was great among provincial medical service systems but minor across regions, and the score changed very little over time. More importantly, the central region held the lowest average efficiency score in the past 6 years, while the western region held the largest average efficiency score at the first 5 years, which should receive enough attention of the government and decision-makers. In practice, efficiency was related to many complicated factors, indicating that the improvement of efficiency is a complex and iterative process that requires the strong cooperation of many sectors.
机译:在过去的几十年中,中国惊人的经济成就不仅显着增加了医疗服务的数量和质量,而且显着增加了地区间卫生资源分配的不平等以及医疗服务的效率低下。描述性分析用于比较省级医疗服务系统投入和产出的不平等,然后使用非径向超高效数据包络分析模型估算效率,并使用面板数据的回归分析探索决定因素。从2009年到2014年,大多数省级医疗服务系统的投入和产出逐渐增加。总体而言,东部地区比其他两个地区分配了更多的人力和资本资源,占门诊和急诊室就诊总数的50%以上,而根据人口分布,西部地区产生了更多的住院服务(约占住院服务总量的30%)。从2009年到2014年,中国大陆省级医疗系统的平均效率得分分别为0.895、0.927、0.929、0.963、0.977和0.968,略有平均提高1.60%。每个省级医疗服务体系的效率得分之间差异很大:西藏(1.475±0.05)的表现非常好,而黑龙江(0.579±0.001)的其他几个则差强人意。此外,高级医疗设施的比例与效率负相关,而弱势人口的比例,人均国内生产总值,文盲人口的比例和初级卫生保健的改善对效率产生积极影响。区域之间在卫生资源分配和服务提供方面存在不平等,但自2009年以来,并非所有差距都开始缩小。各省级医疗服务系统之间的效率差异很大,而各区域之间差异很小,并且得分随时间变化很小。更重要的是,中部地区在过去6年中的平均效率得分最低,而西部地区在前5年中的平均效率得分最高,这应该得到政府和决策者的足够重视。在实践中,效率与许多复杂的因素有关,这表明效率的提高是一个复杂而反复的过程,需要许多部门的大力合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号