首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

机译:在资源贫乏地区,药物流产后的随访方式是否会影响避孕药的使用?非劣效性随机对照试验的次要结果分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Post-abortion contraceptive use in India is low and the use of modern methods of contraception is rare, especially in rural areas. This study primarily compares contraceptive use among women whose abortion outcome was assessed in-clinic with women who assessed their abortion outcome at home, in a low-resource, primary health care setting. Moreover, it investigates how background characteristics and abortion service provision influences contraceptive use post-abortion. Methods A randomized controlled, non-inferiority, trial (RCT) compared clinic follow-up with home-assessment of abortion outcome at 2?weeks post-abortion. Additionally, contraceptive-use at 3?months post-abortion was investigated through a cross-sectional follow-up interview with a largely urban sub-sample of women from the RCT. Women seeking abortion with a gestational age of up to 9?weeks and who agreed to a 2-week follow-up were included ( n =?731). Women with known contraindications to medical abortions, Hb?Results There were no differences between contraceptive use and continuation between study groups at 3?months (76?% clinic follow-up, 77?% home-assessment), however women in the clinic follow-up group were most likely to adopt a contraceptive method at 2?weeks (62?±?12?%), while women in the home-assessment group were most likely to adopt a method after next menstruation (60?±?13?%). Fifty-two per cent of women who initiated a method at 2?weeks chose the 3-month injection or the copper intrauterine device. Only 4?% of women preferred sterilization. Caste, educational attainment, or type of residence did not influence contraceptive use. Conclusions Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion will not change women’s opportunities to access contraception in a low-resource setting, if contraceptive services are provided as intra-abortion services as early as on day one. Women’s postabortion contraceptive use at 3?months is unlikely to be affected by mode of followup after medical abortion, also in a low-resource setting. Clinical guidelines need to encourage intra-abortion contraception, offering the full spectrum of evidence-based methods, especially long-acting reversible methods. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01827995
机译:背景技术在印度,堕胎后避孕药具的使用率很低,并且现代避孕方法的使用很少,尤其是在农村地区。这项研究主要比较了在资源贫乏的初级卫生保健环境中评估了流产结果的妇女与在家中评估流产结果的妇女之间的避孕药具使用情况。此外,它研究了背景特征和堕胎服务的提供如何影响堕胎后避孕药的使用。方法一项随机对照,非劣效性试验(RCT)将流产后2周的临床随访与流产结局的家庭评估进行了比较。此外,还通过横断面随访访谈,对来自RCT的大部分城市女性样本进行了调查,对堕胎后3个月的避孕药具使用情况进行了调查。寻求胎龄不超过9周的流产并同意进行2周随访的妇女(n = 731)。结果已知有药物流产禁忌症的妇女Hb结果研究组在3个月时使用避孕药和继续使用避孕药之间无差异(76%的临床随访率,77%的家庭评估率),但临床随访的妇女向上组最有可能在2周时采用避孕方法(62%±12%),而家庭评估组中的女性最有可能在下次月经后采用避孕方法(60?±13%)。 %)。在2周时开始使用该方法的女性中,有52%选择了3个月的注射或宫腔内使用铜器。只有4%的女性更喜欢绝育。种姓,受教育程度或居住类型不影响避孕药具的使用。结论如果在第一天就提供避孕服务作为堕胎内服务,那么在早期药物流产后简化随访不会改变妇女在资源贫乏地区获得避孕的机会。妇女流产后3个月的避孕药具使用情况,即使在资源匮乏的情况下,也不太可能受到药物流产后随访方式的影响。临床指南需要鼓励流产内避孕,提供各种循证方法,尤其是长效可逆方法。试用注册Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01827995

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号