首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Bicycling crash circumstances vary by route type: a cross-sectional analysis
【24h】

Bicycling crash circumstances vary by route type: a cross-sectional analysis

机译:骑车撞车的情况因路线类型而异:横截面分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Widely varying crash circumstances have been reported for bicycling injuries, likely because of differing bicycling populations and environments. We used data from the Bicyclists’ Injuries and the Cycling Environment Study in Vancouver and Toronto, Canada, to describe the crash circumstances of people injured while cycling for utilitarian and leisure purposes. We examined the association of crash circumstances with route type. Methods Adult cyclists injured and treated in a hospital emergency department described their crash circumstances. These were classified into major categories (collision vs. fall, motor vehicle involved vs. not) and subcategories. The distribution of circumstances was tallied for each of 14 route types defined in an earlier analysis. Ratios of observed vs. expected were tallied for each circumstance and route type combination. Results Of 690 crashes, 683 could be characterized for this analysis. Most (74%) were collisions. Collisions included those with motor vehicles (34%), streetcar (tram) or train tracks (14%), other surface features (10%), infrastructure (10%), and pedestrians, cyclists, or animals (6%). The remainder of the crashes were falls (26%), many as a result of collision avoidance manoeuvres. Motor vehicles were involved directly or indirectly with 48% of crashes. Crash circumstances were distributed differently by route type, for example, collisions with motor vehicles, including “doorings”, were overrepresented on major streets with parked cars. Collisions involving streetcar tracks were overrepresented on major streets. Collisions involving infrastructure (curbs, posts, bollards, street furniture) were overrepresented on multiuse paths and bike paths. Conclusions These data supplement our previous analyses of relative risks by route type by indicating the types of crashes that occur on each route type. This information can guide municipal engineers and planners towards improvements that would make cycling safer.
机译:背景技术据报道,骑自行车受伤的撞车情况变化很大,这可能是由于骑自行车的人群和环境不同所致。我们使用了来自加拿大温哥华和多伦多的自行车伤害和自行车环境研究中的数据,来描述出于功利和休闲目的骑车时受伤人员的撞车情况。我们研究了碰撞情况与路线类型的关联。方法在医院急诊室受伤并接受治疗的成年骑自行车者描述了他们的撞车情况。这些分为主要类别(碰撞与坠落,涉及的机动车辆与非撞击)和子类别。对于较早的分析中定义的14种路线类型中的每一种,都记录了环境的分布。计算每种情况和路线类型组合的观察值与预期值之比。在690起撞车事故中,有683起发生撞车事故。大多数(74%)是碰撞。碰撞包括机动车辆(34%),有轨电车(电车)或火车轨道(14%),其他表面特征(10%),基础设施(10%)以及行人,骑自行车的人或动物(6%)的碰撞。其余的坠毁事故是坠落事故(占26%),其中许多是由于避免撞车行为造成的。机动车直接或间接涉及事故的48%。碰撞情况的分布方式因路线类型而异,例如,与机动车(包括“车门”)的碰撞在停放汽车的主要街道上所占的比例过高。在主要街道上,涉及路面电车轨道的碰撞过多。在多用途路径和自行车路径上,涉及基础设施(路边,柱子,系柱,街道家具)的碰撞过多。结论这些数据通过指出每种路线类型上发生的撞车类型,补充了我们以前按路线类型进行的相对风险分析。这些信息可以指导市政工程师和规划人员进行改进,使骑车更加安全。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号