首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales
【24h】

Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales

机译:城市化,城市化与健康:城市化量表的信度和效度的系统评价

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Despite a plethora of studies examining the effect of increased urbanisation on health, no single study has systematically examined the measurement properties of scales used to measure urbanicity. It is critical to distinguish findings from studies that use surrogate measures of urbanicity (e.g. population density) from those that use measures rigorously tested for reliability and validity. The purpose of this study was to assess the measurement reliability and validity of the available urbanicity scales and identify areas where more research is needed to facilitate the development of a standardised measure of urbanicity. Methods Databases searched were MEDLINE with Full Text, CINAHL with Full Text, and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost) as well as Embase (Ovid) covering the period from January 1970 to April 2012. Studies included in this systematic review were those that focused on the development of an urbanicity scale with clearly defined items or the adoption of an existing scale, included at least one outcome measure related to health, published in peer-reviewed journals, the full text was available in English and tested for validity and reliability. Results Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria which were conducted in Sri Lanka, Austria, China, Nigeria, India and Philippines. They ranged in size from 3327 to 33,404 participants. The number of scale items ranged from 7 to 12 items in 5 studies. One study measured urban area socioeconomic disadvantage instead of urbanicity. The emerging evidence is that increased urbanisation is associated with deleterious health outcomes. It is possible that increased urbanisation is also associated with access and utilisation of health services. However, urbanicity measures differed across studies, and the reliability and validity properties of the used scales were not well established. Conclusion There is an urgent need for studies to standardise measures of urbanicity. Longitudinal cohort studies to confirm the relationship between increased urbanisation and health outcomes are urgently needed.
机译:背景技术尽管有大量研究检查了城市化程度对健康的影响,但没有一项研究系统地检查了用于测量城市化程度的量表的测量特性。至关重要的是,将使用替代性城市度量标准(例如人口密度)的研究结果与使用严格测试的信度和效度的研究结果区分开来。这项研究的目的是评估可用城市度量表的测量信度和效度,并确定需要开展更多研究以促进城市化标准度量方法发展的领域。方法搜索的数据库为MEDLINE(含全文本),CINAHL(含全文本)和PsycINFO(EBSCOhost)以及Embase(Ovid),涵盖了1970年1月至2012年4月这段时间。具有明确定义项目的城市规模量表或采用现有量表,包括至少一项与健康相关的结果指标,并在同行评审的期刊上发布,全文以英文提供,并进行了有效性和可靠性测试。结果在斯里兰卡,奥地利,中国,尼日利亚,印度和菲律宾进行的11项研究符合我们的纳入标准。他们的规模从3327人到33404人不等。在5个研究中,量表项的数量从7到12个不等。一项研究测量了城市地区的社会经济劣势,而不是城市化程度。越来越多的证据表明,城市化的加剧与健康状况的恶化有关。日益城市化也可能与卫生服务的获取和利用有关。然而,城市性度量在各个研究中有所不同,并且所使用量表的信度和效度属性还没有很好地建立。结论迫切需要进行研究以规范城市化措施。迫切需要进行纵向队列研究,以确认城市化程度提高与健康结果之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号