首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Identifying factors relevant in the assessment of return-to-work efforts in employees on long-term sickness absence due to chronic low back pain: a focus group study
【24h】

Identifying factors relevant in the assessment of return-to-work efforts in employees on long-term sickness absence due to chronic low back pain: a focus group study

机译:一项针对焦点小组的研究,确定与评估因长期腰背痛而长期缺勤的员工的工作重返工作相关的因素

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Efforts undertaken during the return to work (RTW) process need to be sufficient to prevent unnecessary applications for disability benefits. The purpose of this study was to identify factors relevant to RTW Effort Sufficiency (RTW-ES) in cases of sick-listed employees with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods Using focus groups consisting of Labor Experts (LE's) working at the Dutch Social Insurance Institute, arguments and underlying grounds relevant to the assessment of RTW-ES were investigated. Factors were collected and categorized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF model). Results Two focus groups yielded 19 factors, of which 12 are categorized in the ICF model under activities (e.g. functional capacity) and in the personal (e.g. age, tenure) and environmental domain (e.g. employer-employee relationship). The remaining 7 factors are categorized under intervention, job accommodation and measures. Conclusions This focus group study shows that 19 factors may be relevant to RTW-ES in sick-listed employees with CLBP. Providing these results to professionals assessing RTW-ES might contribute to a more transparent and systematic approach. Considering the importance of the quality of the RTW process, optimizing the RTW-ES assessment is essential.
机译:背景技术在恢复工作(RTW)的过程中需要做出足够的努力,以防止不必要的残障福利申请。这项研究的目的是确定与患有慢性腰背痛(CLBP)的病历雇员相比,与RTW努力满意度(RTW-ES)相关的因素。方法使用由荷兰社会保险研究所的劳动专家(LE)组成的焦点小组,对与RTW-ES评估相关的论点和依据进行了调查。使用国际功能,残疾与健康分类(ICF模型)收集因素并进行分类。结果两个焦点小组产生了19个因素,其中12个因素在ICF模型中按活动(例如功能能力)以及个人(例如年龄,任期)和环境领域(例如雇主与雇员关系)分类。其余7个因素分为干预,工作适应和措施。结论这项焦点小组研究表明,有19个因素可能与CLBP患病上市员工的RTW-ES有关。将这些结果提供给评估RTW-ES的专业人员可能会有助于建立更透明和系统的方法。考虑到RTW流程质量的重要性,优化RTW-ES评估至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号