首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Is gender policy related to the gender gap in external cause and circulatory disease mortality? A mixed effects model of 22 OECD countries 1973–2008
【24h】

Is gender policy related to the gender gap in external cause and circulatory disease mortality? A mixed effects model of 22 OECD countries 1973–2008

机译:性别政策是否与外因和循环系统疾病死亡率方面的性别差距有关? 1973–2008年间22个经合组织国家的混合效应模型

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Gender differences in mortality vary widely between countries and over time, but few studies have examined predictors of these variations, apart from smoking. The aim of this study is to investigate the link between gender policy and the gender gap in cause-specific mortality, adjusted for economic factors and health behaviours. Methods 22 OECD countries were followed 1973–2008 and the outcomes were gender gaps in external cause and circulatory disease mortality. A previously found country cluster solution was used, which includes indicators on taxes, parental leave, pensions, social insurances and social services in kind. Male breadwinner countries were made reference group and compared to earner-carer, compensatory breadwinner, and universal citizen countries. Specific policies were also analysed. Mixed effect models were used, where years were the level 1-units, and countries were the level 2-units. Results Both the earner-carer cluster (ns after adjustment for GDP) and policies characteristic of that cluster are associated with smaller gender differences in external causes, particularly due to an association with increased female mortality. Cluster differences in the gender gap in circulatory disease mortality are the result of a larger relative decrease of male mortality in the compensatory breadwinner cluster and the earner-carer cluster. Policies characteristic of those clusters were however generally related to increased mortality. Conclusion Results for external cause mortality are in concordance with the hypothesis that women become more exposed to risks of accident and violence when they are economically more active. For circulatory disease mortality, results differ depending on approach – cluster or indicator. Whether cluster differences not explained by specific policies reflect other welfare policies or unrelated societal trends is an open question. Recommendations for further studies are made.
机译:背景死亡率的性别差异因国家和地区而异,但随着时间的推移,几乎没有研究检验这些差异的预测因素。这项研究的目的是调查性别政策与因特定原因而死亡的性别差距之间的联系,并根据经济因素和健康行为进行调整。方法1973年至2008年期间,对22个经合组织国家进行了追踪,其结果是外部原因和循环系统疾病死亡率方面的性别差距。使用了以前发现的国家集群解决方案,其中包括税收,育儿假,退休金,社会保险和实物社会服务的指标。将男性养家糊口的国家作为参考组,并将其与赚钱者,补偿性养家糊口的国家和普遍公民国家进行比较。还分析了具体政策。使用了混合效应模型,其中年份是1级单位,而国家是2级单位。结果既有收入者/照顾者群体(根据GDP调整后的ns)和该群体的特征性政策都与较小的外部原因性别差异有关,特别是由于与女性死亡率增加有关。循环系统疾病死亡率中性别差距的聚类差异是补偿性养家糊口者群体和有薪照顾者群体中男性死亡率较大相对下降的结果。但是,这些集群的政策特征通常与死亡率增加有关。结论外因死亡率的结果与以下假设相一致:在经济上更加活跃的妇女更容易遭受事故和暴力的威胁。对于循环系统疾病的死亡率,结果因方法而异-分类或指标。未由具体政策解释的集群差异是否反映了其他福利政策或不相关的社会趋势,这是一个悬而未决的问题。提出了进一步研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号