首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Do existing research summaries on health systems match immunisation managers' needs in middle- and low-income countries? Analysis of GAVI health systems strengthening support
【24h】

Do existing research summaries on health systems match immunisation managers' needs in middle- and low-income countries? Analysis of GAVI health systems strengthening support

机译:现有的有关卫生系统的研究摘要是否符合中低收入国家免疫接种管理者的需求?分析GAVI卫生系统加强支持

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The GAVI Alliance was created in 2000 to increase access to vaccines. More recently, GAVI has supported evidence-based health systems strengthening to overcome barriers to vaccination. Our objectives were: to explore countries' priorities for health systems strengthening; to describe published research summaries for each priority area in relation to their number, quality and relevance; and to describe the use of national data from surveys in identifying barriers to immunisation. Methods From 44 health systems strengthening proposals submitted to GAVI in 2007 and 2008, we analysed the topics identified, the coverage of these topics by existing systematic reviews and the use of nation-wide surveys with vaccination data to justify the needs identified in the proposals. Results Thirty topics were identified and grouped into three thematic areas: health workforce (10 topics); organisation and management (14); and supply, distribution and maintenance (6). We found 51 potentially relevant systematic reviews, although for the topic that appeared most frequently in the proposals ('Health information systems') no review was identified. Thematic and geographic relevance were generally categorised as "high" in 33 (65%) and 25 (49%) reviews, respectively, but few reviews were categorised as "highly relevant for policy" (7 reviews, 14%). With regard to methodological quality, 14 reviews (27%) were categorised as "high". The number of topics that were addressed by at least one high quality systematic review was: seven of the 10 topics in the 'health workforce' thematic area; six of the 14 topics in the area of 'organisation and management'; and none of the topics in the thematic area of 'supply, distribution and maintenance'. Only twelve of the 39 countries with available national surveys referred to them in their proposals. Conclusion Relevant, high quality research summaries were found for few of the topics identified by managers. Few proposals used national surveys evidence to identify barriers to vaccination. Researchers generating or adapting evidence about health systems need to be more responsive to managers' needs. Use of available evidence from local or national surveys should be strongly encouraged.
机译:背景GAVI联盟成立于2000年,目的是增加疫苗的可及性。最近,GAVI支持加强循证卫生系统,以克服疫苗接种的障碍。我们的目标是:探讨各国加强卫生系统的优先事项;描述有关每个优先领域的已发表研究摘要的数量,质量和相关性;并描述使用调查中的国家数据确定免疫障碍的方法。方法在2007年和2008年提交给GAVI的44项卫生系统加强建议中,我们分析了所确定的主题,现有系统评价对这些主题的覆盖范围以及使用全国范围的带有疫苗接种数据的调查来证明建议中所确定的需求的合理性。结果确定了30个主题并将其分为三个主题领域:卫生人力(10个主题);组织与管理(14);以及供应,分配和维护(6)。我们发现了51项可能相关的系统评价,尽管对于提案中最频繁出现的主题(“健康信息系统”),没有发现任何评价。主题和地理相关性通常分别在33(65%)和25(49%)条评论中被归类为“高”,但是很少有评论被归类为“与政策高度相关”(7条评论,14%)。关于方法学质量,有14篇评论(占27%)被归类为“高”。至少一项高质量的系统评价所涉及的主题数量是:“卫生人力”主题领域的10个主题中的7个; “组织和管理”领域的14个主题中的6个; “供应,分配和维护”主题领域中没有任何主题。在可进行国家调查的39个国家中,只有12个国家在其提案中提到了它们。结论对于管理者确定的几个主题,没有找到相关的高质量研究摘要。很少有提案使用国家调查证据来确定接种疫苗的障碍。研究人员生成或调整有关卫生系统的证据时,需要对管理人员的需求做出更迅速的响应。应大力鼓励使用来自地方或国家调查的可用证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号