首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Effects of lifestyle intervention in persons at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus - results from a randomised, controlled trial
【24h】

Effects of lifestyle intervention in persons at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus - results from a randomised, controlled trial

机译:生活方式干预对2型糖尿病高危人群的影响-一项随机对照试验的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Lifestyle change is probably the most important single action to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a low-intensity individual lifestyle intervention by a physician and compare this to the same physician intervention combined with an interdisciplinary, group-based approach in a real-life setting. Methods The "Finnish Diabetes Risk score" (FINDRISC) was used by GPs to identify individuals at high risk. A randomised, controlled design and an 18 month follow-up was used to assess the effect of individual lifestyle counselling by a physician (individual physician group, (IG)) every six months, with emphasis on diet and exercise, and compare this to the same individual lifestyle counselling combined with a group-based interdisciplinary program (individual and interdisciplinary group, (IIG)) provided over 16 weeks. Primary outcomes were changes in lifestyle indicated by weight reduction ≥ 5%, improvement in exercise capacity as assessed by VO2 max and diet improvements according to the Smart Diet Score (SDS). Results 213 participants (104 in the IG and 109 in the IIG group, 50% women), with a mean age of 46 and mean body mass index 37, were included (inclusion rate > 91%) of whom 182 returned at follow-up (drop-out rate 15%). There were no significant differences in changes in lifestyle behaviours between the two groups. At baseline 57% (IG) and 53% (IIG) of participants had poor aerobic capacity and after intervention 35% and 33%, respectively, improved their aerobic capacity at least one metabolic equivalent. Unhealthy diets according to SDS were common in both groups at baseline, 61% (IG) and 60% (IIG), but uncommon at follow-up, 17% and 10%, respectively. At least 5% weight loss was achieved by 35% (IG) and 28% (IIG). In the combined IG and IIG group, at least one primary outcome was achieved by 93% while all primary outcomes were achieved by 6%. Most successful was the 78% reduction in the proportion of participants with unhealthy diet (almost 50% absolute reduction). Conclusion It is possible to achieve important lifestyle changes in persons at risk for type 2 diabetes with modest clinical efforts. Group intervention yields no additional effects. The design of the study, with high inclusion and low dropout rates, should make the results applicable to ordinary clinical settings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00202748
机译:背景改变生活方式可能是预防2型糖尿病最重要的单一措施。这项研究的目的是评估医师低强度的个人生活方式干预的效果,并将其与同一医师的干预措施结合跨学科,基于小组的方法在现实生活中的效果进行比较。方法GP使用“芬兰糖尿病风险评分”(FINDRISC)来识别高危人群。随机(对照)设计和18个月的随访用于评估医师(个人医师小组(IG))每六个月进行一次个人生活方式咨询的效果,重点是饮食和运动,并将其与在16周内提供了相同的个人生活方式咨询,并结合了基于小组的跨学科计划(个人和跨学科小组(IIG))。主要结果是体重减轻≥5%所指示的生活方式改变,VO 2 max评估的运动能力改善以及根据Smart Diet Score(SDS)改善饮食。结果纳入了213名参与者(IG中为104名,IIG组为109名,女性占50%),平均年龄46岁,平均体重指数37(纳入率> 91%),其中182名在随访中返回(辍学率15%)。两组之间在生活方式上的变化没有显着差异。在基线时,有氧能力差的受试者为57%(IG)和53%(IIG),干预后分别有35%和33%的受试者有氧能力提高了至少一种代谢当量。根据SDS,不健康饮食在基线时两组都很常见,分别为61%(IG)和60%(IIG),但在随访中不常见,分别为17%和10%。 35%(IG)和28%(IIG)实现了至少5%的体重减轻。在IG和IIG联合治疗组中,至少一项主要疗效达到了93%,而所有主要疗效都达到了6%。最成功的是饮食不健康的参与者比例减少了78%(绝对减少了近50%)。结论通过适度的临床努力,就有可能在2型糖尿病高危人群中实现重要的生活方式改变。小组干预不会产生任何其他影响。具有高纳入和低辍学率的研究设计应使结果适用于普通临床环境。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00202748

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号