首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits
【24h】

A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits

机译:一个结构化的框架,用于改进爆发调查审核

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundOutbreak investigation is a core function of public health agencies. Suboptimal outbreak investigation endangers both public health and agency reputations. While audits of clinical medical and nursing practice are conducted as part of continuous quality improvement, public health agencies rarely make systematic use of structured audits to ensure best practice for outbreak responses, and there is limited guidance or policy to guide outbreak audit.MethodsA framework for prioritising which outbreak investigations to audit, an approach for conducting a successful audit, and a template for audit trigger questions was developed and trialled in four foodborne outbreaks and a respiratory disease outbreak in Australia.ResultsThe following issues were identified across several structured audits: the need for clear definitions of roles and responsibilities both within and between agencies, improved communication between agencies and with external stakeholders involved in outbreaks, and the need for development of performance standards in outbreak investigations - particularly in relation to timeliness of response. Participants considered the audit process and methodology to be clear, useful, and non-threatening. Most audits can be conducted within two to three hours, however, some participants felt this limited the scope of the audit.ConclusionThe framework was acceptable to participants, provided an opportunity for clarifying perceptions and enhancing partnership approaches, and provided useful recommendations for approaching future outbreaks. Future challenges include incorporating feedback from broader stakeholder groups, for example those of affected cases, institutions and businesses; assessing the quality of a specific audit; developing training for both participants and facilitators; and building a central capacity to support jurisdictions embarking on an audit. The incorporation of measurable performance criteria or sharing of benchmark performance criteria will assist in the standardisation of outbreak investigation audit and further quality improvement.
机译:背景暴发调查是公共卫生机构的一项核心职能。次优爆发调查既危害公共健康,也危害机构声誉。虽然临床医学和护理实践的审核是不断提高质量的一部分,但公共卫生机构很少系统地使用结构化审核来确保爆发应对的最佳实践,而且指导爆发审核的指导或政策也很有限。在澳大利亚的四起食源性暴发和呼吸系统疾病暴发中,开发并试用了要进行审计的暴发调查的优先级,成功进行审计的方法以及审计触发问题的模板。结果在多个结构化审计中确定了以下问题:明确定义机构内部和机构之间的角色和职责,改善机构之间以及与爆发相关的外部利益相关者之间的沟通,以及在爆发调查中制定绩效标准的必要性,尤其是在响应及时性方面。与会者认为审核过程和方法清晰,有用且无威胁。大多数审核可以在两到三个小时内进行,但是,一些参与者认为这限制了审核的范围。结论该框架对于参与者是可以接受的,为澄清看法和加强合作伙伴关系提供了机会,并为应对未来爆发提供了有用的建议。未来的挑战包括纳入利益相关者群体的反馈,例如,受影响的案例,机构和企业的反馈;评估特定审核的质量;为参与者和促进者进行培训;建立中央能力以支持即将进行审计的司法管辖区。纳入可衡量的绩效标准或共享基准绩效标准将有助于爆发调查审核的标准化和进一步的质量改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号