...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Waist-to-height ratio as an indicator of ‘early health risk’: simpler and more predictive than using a ‘matrix’ based on BMI and waist circumference
【24h】

Waist-to-height ratio as an indicator of ‘early health risk’: simpler and more predictive than using a ‘matrix’ based on BMI and waist circumference

机译:腰高比是“早期健康风险”的指标:比使用基于BMI和腰围的“矩阵”更简单,更具预测性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives There is now good evidence that central obesity carries more health risks compared with total obesity assessed by body mass index (BMI). It has therefore been suggested that waist circumference (WC), a proxy for central obesity, should be included with BMI in a ‘matrix’ to categorise health risk. We wanted to compare how the adult UK population is classified using such a ‘matrix’ with that using another proxy for central obesity, waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), using a boundary value of 0.5. Further, we wished to compare cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with ‘healthy’ BMI divided according to whether they have WHtR below or above 0.5. Setting, participants and outcome measures Recent data from 4?years (2008–2012) of the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) (n=1453 adults) were used to cross-classify respondents on anthropometric indices. Regression was used to examine differences in levels of risk factors (triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), TC: HDL, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting glucose, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP)) according to WHtR below and above 0.5, with adjustment for confounders (age, sex and BMI). Results 35% of the group who were judged to be at ‘no increased risk’ using the ‘matrix’ had WHtR ≥0.5. The ‘matrix’ did not assign ‘increased risk’ to those with a ‘healthy’ BMI and ‘high’ waist circumference. However, our analysis showed that the group with ‘healthy’ BMI, and WHtR ≥0.5, had some significantly higher cardiometabolic risk factors compared to the group with ‘healthy’ BMI but WHtR below 0.5. Conclusions Use of a simple boundary value for WHtR (0.5) identifies more people at ‘early health risk’ than does a more complex ‘matrix’ using traditional boundary values for BMI and WC. WHtR may be a simpler and more predictive indicator of the ‘early heath risks’ associated with central obesity.
机译:目的现在有充分的证据表明,与通过体重指数(BMI)评估的总体肥胖相比,中心型肥胖对健康的危害更大。因此,建议将腰围(WC)(代表中枢性肥胖)与BMI一起纳入“矩阵”中,以对健康风险进行分类。我们想比较使用这种“矩阵”将英国成年人口与使用另一种替代性中枢肥胖(腰围与身高比(WHtR),使用边界值0.5)进行分类的情况。此外,我们希望比较“健康” BMI成年人的心脏代谢危险因素,根据他们的WHtR低于或高于0.5来划分。设置,参与者和结果指标使用英国国家饮食和营养调查(NDNS)(n = 1453名成年人)4年(2008-2012)的最新数据对人体测量学指标进行交叉分类。使用回归分析检查危险因素(甘油三酸酯(TG),总胆固醇(TC),低密度脂蛋白(LDL),高密度脂蛋白(HDL),TC:HDL,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),禁食的水平之间的差异根据WHtR将血糖,收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)设为0.5或以上,并调整混杂因素(年龄,性别和BMI)。结果使用“矩阵”被判定为“无增加风险”的组中有35%的WHtR≥0.5。 “矩阵”并未将BMI为“健康”且腰围为“高”的人群分配“增加的风险”。但是,我们的分析表明,“健康” BMI且WHtR≥0.5的人群的心脏代谢危险因素明显高于“健康” BMI但WHtR低于0.5的人群。结论对于WHtR(0.5)使用简单的边界值,比使用BMI和WC的传统边界值的更复杂的“矩阵”识别更多的“早期健康风险”人群。 WHtR可能是与中枢性肥胖有关的“早期健康风险”的更简单且更具预测性的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号