首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Conflict-of-interest disclosure at medical journals in Japan: a nationwide survey of the practices of journal secretariats
【24h】

Conflict-of-interest disclosure at medical journals in Japan: a nationwide survey of the practices of journal secretariats

机译:日本医学期刊的利益冲突披露:期刊秘书处实践的全国性调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives Medical journals in Japan generally have appropriate policies regarding disclosure of conflicts of interest (COI). However, COI management depends on the staff members of each journal's editorial secretariat. This study's objectives were to find out (A) whether COI disclosure and the journal's role in it are clearly understood by the journal’s secretariat staff, (B) how much experience the editorial secretariat has in actually handling issues related to disclosure and (C) what kind of help or support they need. Setting and design In January 2014, questionnaires were sent to the editorial secretariats of journal-publishing societies belonging to the Japanese Association of Medical Sciences (JAMS). Participants The response rate was 100%, and the respondents represented 121 journals published by the 118 JAMS member societies (at the time of the survey). Primary and secondary outcome measures Information was collected on the history of COI policies and on how those policies were implemented. At the end of the questionnaire, there was an open-ended call for comments. Results Compulsory COI disclosure began between 2010 and 2013 for 60.3% of the journals (73/121). Handling of COI issues was not uniform: 17.4% (21/121) of respondents do not pursue cases of dubious disclosure, and 47.9% (58/121) do not require COI disclosures from editorial board members. Very few of the editorial secretariats had clearly-stated consequences for violations of COI-disclosure policy (33/121, 27.3%), and only 28.9% offered COI education (35/121). Respondents’ comments indicated that uniform, easily-searchable guidance regarding COI policies and implementation would be welcome. Conclusions Although commitment is widespread, policy implementation is inconsistent and COI experience is lacking. Clear, easy-to-use guidelines are desired by many societies. The JAMS is to be commended for supporting this country-wide investigation; other countries and regions are encouraged to perform similar investigations to respond to needs regarding COI management.
机译:目的日本的医学期刊一般都具有披露利益冲突(COI)的适当政策。但是,COI管理取决于每个期刊的编辑秘书处的工作人员。这项研究的目的是找出(A)杂志的秘书处工作人员是否清楚地了解了COI披露及其在期刊中的作用;(B)编辑秘书处在实际处理与披露有关的问题上有多少经验;以及(C)他们需要的帮助或支持。设置和设计2014年1月,向日本医学科学协会(JAMS)所属期刊出版协会的编辑秘书处发送了问卷。参与者回应率为100%,受访者代表了118个JAMS成员协会出版的121种期刊(在调查时)。主要和次要结果衡量指标收集了有关COI政策的历史以及这些政策的实施方式的信息。在问卷的结尾,有一个开放性的征求意见电话。结果从2010年至2013年,强制公开COI的期刊占60.3%(73/121)。处理COI问题的方法并不统一:17.4%(21/121)的受访者不追究可疑披露的案例,而47.9%(58/121)的受访者不要求编辑委员会成员披露COI。很少有编辑秘书处对违反COI披露政策的后果做出明确陈述的后果(33/121,占27.3%),只有28.9%的组织提供COI教育(35/121)。受访者的评论表明,将欢迎有关COI政策和实施的统一且易于搜索的指南。结论尽管承诺广泛存在,但政策实施却不一致,并且缺乏COI经验。许多社会都需要清晰易用的指南。赞扬JAMS支持这项全国性调查;鼓励其他国家和地区进行类似的调查,以回应有关COI管理的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号