...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Pilot investigation of the oxygen demands and metabolic cost of incremental shuttle walking and treadmill walking in patients with cardiovascular disease
【24h】

Pilot investigation of the oxygen demands and metabolic cost of incremental shuttle walking and treadmill walking in patients with cardiovascular disease

机译:心血管疾病患者增量穿梭步行和跑步机步行的氧气需求和代谢成本的初步研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective To determine if the metabolic cost of the incremental shuttle-walking test protocol is the same as treadmill walking or predicted values of walking-speed equations. Setting Primary care (community-based cardiac rehabilitation). Participants Eight Caucasian cardiac rehabilitation patients (7 males) with a mean age of 67±5.2?years. Primary and secondary outcome measures Oxygen consumption, metabolic power and energy cost of walking during treadmill and shuttle walking performed in a balanced order with 1?week between trials. Results Average overall energy cost per metre was higher during treadmill walking (3.22±0.55?J?kg/m) than during shuttle walking (3.00±0.41?J?kg/m). There were significant post hoc effects at 0.67?m/s (p0.004) and 0.84?m/s (p0.001), where the energy cost of treadmill walking was significantly higher than that of shuttle walking. This pattern was reversed at walking speeds 1.52?m/s (p0.042) and 1.69?m/s (p0.007) where shuttle walking had a greater energy cost per metre than treadmill walking. At all walking speeds, the energy cost of shuttle walking was higher than that predicted using the American College of Sports Medicine walking equations. Conclusions The energetic demands of shuttle walking were fundamentally different from those of treadmill walking and should not be directly compared. We warn against estimating the metabolic cost of the incremental shuttle-walking test using the current walking-speed equations.
机译:目的确定增量式穿梭行走试验方案的代谢成本是否与跑步机行走或行走速度方程的预测值相同。设置初级保健(基于社区的心脏康复)。参与者8名高加索心脏康复患者(7名男性),平均年龄为67±5.2?岁。主要和次要结果测量跑步机和穿梭步行期间的耗氧量,代谢能力和步行能量消耗以平衡的顺序进行,试验之间间隔1周。结果跑步机步行期间每米平均总能量成本(3.22±0.55?J?kg / m)比穿梭步行期间(3.00±0.41?J?kg / m)高。事后效应显着,分别为0.67?m / s(p <0.004)和0.84?m / s(p <0.001),其中跑步机步行的能量成本显着高于穿梭步行的能量成本。在步行速度为1.52?m / s(p <0.042)和1.69?m / s(p <0.007)的情况下,这种模式发生了逆转,在这种情况下,穿梭步行每米的能量消耗比跑步机步行要大。在所有步行速度下,穿梭步行的能源成本都高于使用美国运动医学学院步行方程式预测的能源成本。结论穿梭步行的能量需求与跑步机步行的能量需求根本不同,因此不应直接进行比较。我们警告不要使用当前的步行速度方程式估算递增的穿梭步行测试的新陈代谢成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号