...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Rapid paediatric fluid resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficiency of two provider-endorsed manual paediatric fluid resuscitation techniques in a simulated setting
【24h】

Rapid paediatric fluid resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficiency of two provider-endorsed manual paediatric fluid resuscitation techniques in a simulated setting

机译:快速的小儿液体复苏术:一项随机对照试验,比较了两种提供者认可的人工小儿液体复苏技术在模拟环境中的效率

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives Manual techniques of intravascular fluid administration are commonly used during paediatric resuscitation, although it is unclear which technique is most efficient in the hands of typical healthcare providers. We compared the rate of fluid administration achieved with the disconnect–reconnect and push–pull manual syringe techniques for paediatric fluid resuscitation in a simulated setting. Methods This study utilised a randomised crossover trial design and enrolled 16 consenting healthcare provider participants from a Canadian paediatric tertiary care centre. The study was conducted in a non-clinical setting using a model simulating a 15?kg child in decompensated shock. Participants administered 900?mL (60?mL/kg) of normal saline to the simulated patient using each of the two techniques under study. The primary outcome was the rate of fluid administration, as determined by two blinded independent video reviewers. We also collected participant demographic data and evaluated other secondary outcomes including total volume administered, number of catheter dislodgements, number of technical errors, and subjective and objective measures of provider fatigue. Results All 16 participants completed the trial. The mean (SD) rate of fluid administration (mL/s) was greater for the disconnect–reconnect technique at 1.77 (0.145) than it was for the push–pull technique at 1.62 (0.226), with a mean difference of 0.15 (95% CI 0.055 to 0.251; p=0.005). There was no difference in mean volume administered (p=0.778) or participant self-reported fatigue (p=0.736) between techniques. No catheter dislodgement events occurred. Conclusions The disconnect–reconnect technique allowed for the fastest rate of fluid administration, suggesting that use of this technique may be preferable in situations requiring rapid resuscitation. These findings may help to inform future iterations of paediatric resuscitation guidelines. Trial registration number This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT01774214] prior to enrolling the first participant.
机译:目的虽然尚不清楚哪种技术在典型的医疗服务提供者手中最有效,但在儿科复苏中通常使用人工血管内输液技术。我们比较了在模拟环境下使用断接-重新连接和推拉式手动注射器技术进行儿科液体复苏的输液速度。方法本研究采用随机交叉试验设计,从加拿大一家儿科三级护理中心招募了16名同意提供医疗服务的参与者。该研究是在非临床环境中使用模拟失代偿性休克的15千克儿童的模型进行的。使用研究中的两种技术,分别向模拟患者给予900?mL(60?mL / kg)生理盐水。主要结果是由两名盲人独立视频审阅者确定的输液速度。我们还收集了参与者的人口统计学数据,并评估了其他次要结局,包括总给药量,导管移位数量,技术错误数量以及提供者疲劳的主观和客观指标。结果所有16名参与者均完成了试验。断开-重新连接技术的输液平均(SD)速率(mL / s)在1.77(0.145)处大于推挽技术在1.62(0.226),平均差为0.15(95) %CI 0.055-0.251; p = 0.005)。两种方法之间的平均给药量(p = 0.778)或参与者自我报告的疲劳(p = 0.736)没有差异。没有发生导管移位事件。结论断开-重新连接技术可实现最快的输液速度,这表明在需要快速复苏的情况下,使用该技术可能更为可取。这些发现可能有助于告知小儿复苏指南的未来迭代。试验注册号在注册第一个参与者之前,该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT01774214]上进行了注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号